BOROCHAT

Return to front page

Newest article: Re: Ball Number 41 by FingersLilyYesterday 22:26Yesterday at 22:26:43view thread

Oldest article: 2 tickets for today by Pedro9/5 10:33Sat May 9 10:33:59 2026view thread

MenuSearch

Next thread: Boro rejects on the telly by Balders17/9 20:45Thu Sep 17 20:45:57 2026view thread

Marschall

By Chuds (Chuds)31/8 22:40Mon Aug 31 22:40:50 2026

Views: 2168

Millwall apparently bid for him.

I do not rate him anywhere near as highly as many seem to, so if a decent bid I would accept it.

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person

Re: Marschall

By HITCHIN CALLING19/9 12:14Sat Sep 19 12:14:19 2026In response to MarschallTop of thread

Views: 374

Starting against West Ham , could be a baptism of fire.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Marschall

By samborough3/9 11:09Thu Sep 3 11:09:58 2026In response to MarschallTop of thread

Views: 725

Apparently now worth 1.2 million

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Marschall

By Balders (BALDOCKBORO)2/9 19:43Wed Sep 2 19:43:29 2026In response to MarschallTop of thread

Views: 836

Not even in their squad tonight.

presumably the registration needs to be logded 24 hours before KO?

At least BGR made Reading's bench...

Edited by BALDOCKBORO at 19:44:39 on 2nd September 2026

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Marschall

By SFCfox2/9 21:34Wed Sep 2 21:34:13 2026In response to Re: MarschallTop of thread

Views: 731

They read Chuds comments regarding Marschall and decided to sell him already.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Marschall

By AgentEves2/9 01:29Wed Sep 2 01:29:42 2026In response to MarschallTop of thread

Views: 934

I see you still haven't moved on from your contrarian tendencies.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Marschall

By BedsBoro (peanut)1/9 14:02Tue Sep 1 14:02:28 2026In response to MarschallTop of thread

Views: 1236

According to the Athletic we are in for Tommy Setford on loan from Arsenal. He was going to Las Palmas but the deal collapsed. Imagine having your heart set on a move to the Canary Islands and ending up in Stevenage...

reply to this article | return to the front page

5 people like this 5 people

Fil Fee info

By IsleOfNate1/9 12:35Tue Sep 1 12:35:38 2026In response to MarschallTop of thread

Views: 1448

£1.3mil upfront for Fil + add ons up to £1.5mil.

apparently

Edited by IsleOfNate at 12:36:07 on 1st September 2026

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person

Re: Fil Fee info

By AndyC1/9 13:39Tue Sep 1 13:39:38 2026In response to Fil Fee info Top of thread

Views: 1274

£1.2million of the add ons being if they win the champions league probably

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Fil Fee info

By Balders (BALDOCKBORO)1/9 13:05Tue Sep 1 13:05:54 2026In response to Fil Fee info Top of thread

Views: 1305

Did we have to give them their arm back?

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person

Re: Fil Fee info

By borogent1/9 12:49Tue Sep 1 12:49:52 2026In response to Fil Fee info Top of thread

Views: 1333

source please

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Fil Fee info

By SFCfox1/9 13:43Tue Sep 1 13:43:34 2026In response to Re: Fil Fee info Top of thread

Views: 1214

Tomato lol

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Fil Fee info

By IsleOfNate1/9 12:53Tue Sep 1 12:53:17 2026In response to Re: Fil Fee info Top of thread

Views: 1295

my mate dan down peartree

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Fil Fee info

By AndyC1/9 13:39Tue Sep 1 13:39:14 2026In response to Re: Fil Fee info Top of thread

Views: 1239

Phillips?

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Fil Fee info

By Tucks1/9 15:57Tue Sep 1 15:57:36 2026In response to Re: Fil Fee info Top of thread

Views: 1098

He was supposed to hold on to the information but carelessly let it slip. So maybe.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Fil Fee info

By Owen B1/9 12:44Tue Sep 1 12:44:16 2026In response to Fil Fee info Top of thread

Views: 1295

Nice. Can see why we said yes. I thought it might be 6 figures, not 7

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Fil Fee info

By Copes (CDawg)1/9 14:04Tue Sep 1 14:04:39 2026In response to Re: Fil Fee info Top of thread

Views: 1162

If we sold him for less than 1m I'd purchase a season ticket so I could throw it on the pitch at the next game.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Fil Fee info

By Owen B1/9 14:12Tue Sep 1 14:12:40 2026In response to Re: Fil Fee info Top of thread

Views: 1146

Haha, steady on now

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Marschall

By Owen B1/9 08:07Tue Sep 1 08:07:31 2026In response to MarschallTop of thread

Views: 1630

Does anyone know if Barden is any good? Or are we going to have to get someone in?

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Marschall

By SFC Jonny1/9 09:55Tue Sep 1 09:55:19 2026In response to Re: MarschallTop of thread

Views: 1422

We might find out tonight...

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Marschall

By MerseyBoro (BrummieBoro)1/9 10:00Tue Sep 1 10:00:52 2026In response to Re: MarschallTop of thread

Views: 1417

Almost certain that Barden will play tonight as any replacement for Marschall wouldn't be registered in time.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Marschall

By IsleOfNate1/9 08:09Tue Sep 1 08:09:43 2026In response to Re: MarschallTop of thread

Views: 1577

We will have to get someone in regardless of Bardens ability; we can't go into the season with 1 senior GK and youth backups.

It'll likely be a loan GK from a Champ/Prem side.

It'll be 50/50 as to whether they're any good; for every Taye, Cooper or Cumming, there's been an Anang, Hegyi, Savin (although he was from Accrington) etc)

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Marschall

By Copes (CDawg)1/9 08:32Tue Sep 1 08:32:51 2026In response to Re: MarschallTop of thread

Views: 1516

Yeah, I think some of us may have forgotten how detrimental a poor Goalkeeper can be.

I don’t remember Hegyi being bad though.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Marschall

By IsleOfNate1/9 08:35Tue Sep 1 08:35:31 2026In response to Re: MarschallTop of thread

Views: 1509

He wasn't awful. He was just there. Made some good stops and let in a few really poor goals. I could have put in Pym in instead.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Marschall

By Chuds (Chuds)1/9 08:47Tue Sep 1 08:47:24 2026In response to Re: MarschallTop of thread

Views: 1524

"He wasn't awful. He was just there."

Which is exactly how I described Marschall last night: "He seems to just be there and keeps a clean sheet if he has little to do. Very rarely do you applaud him making a top save or block."

Maybe I am doing him a disservice, but almost any save he makes you would be disappointed if your GK didn't make it, he doesn't command his box, and he often seems very slow to come out or react and you feel could do better for plenty of goals we concede.

Clearly some people rate him, and maybe we will end up with somebody who is at fault even more and longing for Marschall, but this is a wise move to cash in on a good offer in my eyes.

reply to this article | return to the front page

2 people like this 2 people

Re: Marschall

By Steve 19701/9 13:07Tue Sep 1 13:07:17 2026In response to Re: MarschallTop of thread

Views: 1222

Really disagree with your Filip opinion - i really like him .

reply to this article | return to the front page

4 people like this 4 people

Re: Marschall

By Tucks1/9 10:09Tue Sep 1 10:09:23 2026In response to Re: MarschallTop of thread

Views: 1370

He’s got the misfortune, if you can call it that, of following on from competent keepers in Taye (pre-injury) and Cooper. Beforehand everyone was compared to Daisy and we had some stinkers in that time.

Hopefully we won’t end up in the same position as we’ve been blessed with decent keepers for a while now. Definitely agree that if a good offer comes in we should absolutely cash in, if he lives up to his potential we’ll presumably have add ons, if he doesn’t then we’ve made money regardless.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Marschall

By IsleOfNate1/9 09:00Tue Sep 1 09:00:57 2026In response to Re: MarschallTop of thread

Views: 1444

I think he's better than you give him credit for, but I wouldn't pick him over Cumming, Cooper, etc.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Marschall

By Chuds (Chuds)1/9 09:05Tue Sep 1 09:05:30 2026In response to Re: MarschallTop of thread

Views: 1459

This is what I mean.

Taye, Cummings, Cooper, Marschall all have almost identical records in terms of goals conceded per game, clean sheets per game etc., so it isn't like Marschall is some must-keep player, as he is just next in a line of similar keepers. The difference being when I watch them, I rate and trust the others more to make unexpected saves.

Not suggesting he is bad, just don't understand why some of our fans rate him so highly.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Marschall

By Deltic 21 (Spirit of East Coast Boro)1/9 10:49Tue Sep 1 10:49:46 2026In response to Re: MarschallTop of thread

Views: 1328

I DO rate him highly and am disappointed he’s going. He does give me confidence and I very much trust him. But there you go again, ruining my argument with your facts and figures… 🙄

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person

Re: Marschall

By IsleOfNate1/9 09:06Tue Sep 1 09:06:23 2026In response to Re: MarschallTop of thread

Views: 1451

I think specifically right now, it's the timing more than the player. I sincerely doubt we can get hold of a replacement better than Fil in the few hours remaining

reply to this article | return to the front page

4 people like this 4 people

Re: Marschall

By Chuds (Chuds)1/9 09:08Tue Sep 1 09:08:14 2026In response to Re: MarschallTop of thread

Views: 1465

But we have also lost a lot of money the past two seasons, and clearly spent well this summer, so if we can cover a decent portion of that by selling one player, whilst believing it won't severely impact us (basically decided we will stay up regardless as we aren't going up), it makes absolute sense to sell him, provided the fee is good.

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person

Re: Marschall

By BedsBoro (peanut)1/9 09:10Tue Sep 1 09:10:13 2026In response to Re: MarschallTop of thread

Views: 1445

He's also been linked with a move for weeks now so you'd have to hope the club have at least one option lined up in case he does leave

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person

Re: Marschall

By Balders (BALDOCKBORO)1/9 09:16Tue Sep 1 09:16:40 2026In response to Re: MarschallTop of thread

Views: 1441

Question: Given we chose to sell him can we still use the emergency loan option to bring someone in after today?

Or does that only apply if a player is injured and its therefore an unexpected emergency? Can't find a clear answer.

Altho' I'd expect us to have someone young in the wings as a loan from a Champ or Prem club, albeit we are.signing them almost unseen and will have to virtually promise them the no.1 shirt till January.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Marschall

By Tucks1/9 10:16Tue Sep 1 10:16:40 2026In response to Re: MarschallTop of thread

Views: 1341

Would assume we’d have to go to with Barden as by selling Marschall we’ve chosen to put ourselves in that position.

Also worth noting that emergency loans have to come from within the EFL which limits options further.

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person

Re: Marschall

By borogent1/9 08:55Tue Sep 1 08:55:54 2026In response to Re: MarschallTop of thread

Views: 1472

How much money involved. My take is why sell a top gk if we wanna progress marshal is good sorry lol

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Marschall

By MerseyBoro (BrummieBoro)1/9 09:03Tue Sep 1 09:03:59 2026In response to Re: MarschallTop of thread

Views: 1445

Depends what the fee is. A fee over £1m is hard to refuse which is what it would likely have taken to get a deal done on deadline day.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Marschall

By IsleOfNate1/9 09:01Tue Sep 1 09:01:33 2026In response to Re: MarschallTop of thread

Views: 1443

~£2m is my guess.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Marschall

By Copes (CDawg)1/9 08:39Tue Sep 1 08:39:05 2026In response to Re: MarschallTop of thread

Views: 1501

I hated, and still actively hate Pym.

reply to this article | return to the front page

3 people like this 3 people

Re: Marschall

By Tucks1/9 10:21Tue Sep 1 10:21:47 2026In response to Re: MarschallTop of thread

Views: 1359

I make it Pym’s a cock.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Marschall

By IsleOfNate1/9 08:40Tue Sep 1 08:40:10 2026In response to Re: MarschallTop of thread

Views: 1473

Weird little cunt of a player.

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person

Re: Marschall

By Owen B1/9 08:42Tue Sep 1 08:42:55 2026In response to Re: MarschallTop of thread

Views: 1474

Christy Pim! I didn't want to be reminded of that name...

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Marschall

By IsleOfNate1/9 08:00Tue Sep 1 08:00:35 2026In response to MarschallTop of thread

Views: 1568

Dead agreed and he's off for his medical.

Villa will have a sell on fee in this deal and given the time and length of contract and that Millwall are coming into a big fee from Brighton, I expect Wallet will have made sure this is will be a record fee.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Marschall

By HITCHIN CALLING31/8 23:20Mon Aug 31 23:20:40 2026In response to MarschallTop of thread

Views: 1807

If they have just bid and we accept, we surely would have to get a loan in, with only 24 hrs left. Early post season I think he was being linked to others. EFIT now recall Sheffield W were one.

Edited by HITCHIN CALLING at 07:28:00 on 1st September 2026

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Marschall

By Balders (BALDOCKBORO)31/8 22:55Mon Aug 31 22:55:08 2026In response to MarschallTop of thread

Views: 1810

if Millwall want him that would suggest hes maybe better than you think.

(I dont think he's anything special either tho')

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Marschall

By Sludgy651/9 08:43Tue Sep 1 08:43:20 2026In response to Re: MarschallTop of thread

Views: 1480

He's a decent shot stopper. My only real issue with him is he flaps when under pressure from set pieces

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Marschall

By Balders (BALDOCKBORO)1/9 08:49Tue Sep 1 08:49:40 2026In response to Re: MarschallTop of thread

Views: 1475

Top half Championship level? Which has to be Millwall's ambition

Not for me. A panic buy due to injury.

Good move for him, a chance to establish himself at the next level and a very big pay rise to boot.

Not great timing for us but we are always going to sell when a good offer lands in our lap, good luck to him.

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person

Previous thread: Supporters Association by Birddog18/9 14:00Fri Sep 18 14:00:35 2026view thread