Newest article: Re: TVC in Puerto Rico by BaldersToday 13:07Today at 13:07:55view thread
Oldest article: Get off the pitch Borehamwood
by Copes 3/5 19:09Sun May 3 19:09:26 2026
2 peopleview thread


Next thread: 🎙️SFC POD: THE BIG SEASON PREVIEW - S8 / EP8 by Boromatt12/8 07:06Wed Aug 12 07:06:40 2026view thread
Trade Unions
Views: 623
Always opposing reform.
https://www.efl.com/news/2026/august/11/efl-statement--professional-footballers--association/
This one opposing the change to the proportion of revenue that League One teams are permitted to allocate to player salaries, from 60 per cent to 50 per cent.
Presumably they think it will limit their members' salary opportunities or result in fewer players being employed.
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Trade Unions
Views: 554
Not much good to PFA members either if a football club goes bust and said players go unpaid (or underpaid) for months on end.
Doubt there's a third tier league anywhere else in the world where players have the same earning opportunities.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Trade Unions
Views: 485
Normally the union could say if they're unsustainable it must be for reasons other than payroll and they should cut spending elsewhere, but in the case of football I'm fairly sure that is in fact the main contributor to debt.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Trade Unions
Views: 529
I assume the always opposing reform maybe tongue in cheek.IMO when employers use the word reforms normally in realty it means cuts to terms and conditions or services to the public.
Anyway if I was a pro EFL player I may too oppose this but from the outside cam see might be good from an overall game point of view.
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Previous thread: round 2 draw predictions? by HappiFry9/8 08:03Sun Aug 9 08:03:41 2026view thread