BOROCHAT

Matt Phillips

By BorosterToday 22:00Today at 22:00:25

Views: 129

He must be dropped for second leg. His first two games he looked fairly useful. However, since then he seems out of his depth and some. Can't work out what Revs sees with him, but we've got other options we can chance.
Get a deja vu feeling like 2012 when we based all our hopes on a poor Stricker like Pat Agymange, especially when John Mousiniho was sat on the bench.
Same again Dan Phillips sat on the bench when why not play him in a more advanced position as he's a much better player.
So, are we going to go up the same road on Wednesday night and go out with a whimper. And for the statistician that would mean four League 1 play off matches=no goals.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Matt Phillips

By HITCHIN CALLINGToday 22:22Today at 22:22:30In response to Matt PhillipsTop of thread

Views: 62

Not sure what other striker options , I make it we had no recognised Centre fwds on the bench even Beryl seems nice injured.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Matt Phillips

By imjake7Today 22:32Today at 22:32:23In response to Re: Matt PhillipsTop of thread

Views: 50

Agreed.

Matt Phillips didn't score a single league goal for Oxford (just one in the EFL Cup) in the two years he was with them.
I don't really feel he's a true striker but he's all we've got to partner JR.

As mentioned elsewhere, we need to figure out how to get Dan Kemp in the action if we are to pose any kind of threat up front.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Matt Phillips

By HITCHIN CALLINGToday 22:36Today at 22:36:55In response to Re: Matt PhillipsTop of thread

Views: 37

Phillips had injury issues there as well, really is a winger anyway but imo given his age as well has done a reasonable job .

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Matt Phillips

By Balders (BALDOCKBORO)Today 22:35Today at 22:35:20In response to Re: Matt PhillipsTop of thread

Views: 45

We've scored twice as many points with Matt than we did without him over comparative games.

Coincidence?

He improves us.

But he was flat today.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Matt Phillips

By BorosterToday 22:43Today at 22:43:42In response to Re: Matt PhillipsTop of thread

Views: 41

He's so poor. Got the touch of a rhino, can't see a pass, reckon we would be better of a man short. Lubalas not great but seriously.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Matt Phillips

By Balders (BALDOCKBORO)Today 22:44Today at 22:44:27In response to Re: Matt PhillipsTop of thread

Views: 37

Lol

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person

Re: Matt Phillips

By BorosterToday 22:48Today at 22:48:44In response to Re: Matt PhillipsTop of thread

Views: 26

Really

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Matt Phillips

By BorosterToday 22:47Today at 22:47:02In response to Re: Matt PhillipsTop of thread

Views: 28

Really

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Matt Phillips

By HITCHIN CALLINGToday 22:45Today at 22:45:18In response to Re: Matt PhillipsTop of thread

Views: 32

You beat me to it.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Matt Phillips

By ChudsToday 22:04Today at 22:04:50In response to Matt PhillipsTop of thread

Views: 98

Lolz.

reply to this article | return to the front page