BOROCHAT

Return to front page

Newest article: Re: Match Fred V Vale by ChudsToday 20:54Today at 20:54:08view thread

Oldest article: Match Thread by RockyBottom4/10/2025 14:32Sat Oct 4 14:32:09 2025view thread

MenuSearch

Match Fred V Vale

By Balders (BALDOCKBORO)Today 19:25Today at 19:25:25

Views: 324

Cornick and Phillips up top, Reid sub.

White, Phillips and Thompson in the middle.

Pidge starts with Freestone and Goode, Sweeney back on the bench. Luther and Saxon WBs.

Like that starting 11. Reid, Kemp and Roberts on the bench if the starters don't get us scoring.

I'd have maybe dropped White for Kemp but depends who pushes up as a 10.

Strap in, goals galore coming....

Edited by BALDOCKBORO at 19:25:52 on 17th February 2026

reply to this article | return to the front page

I did say strap in....

By Balders (BALDOCKBORO)Today 20:43Today at 20:43:01In response to Match Fred V ValeTop of thread

Views: 93

Not dull is it.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: I did say strap in....

By ChudsToday 20:51Today at 20:51:46In response to I did say strap in....Top of thread

Views: 26

So much happened I have spent half the match getting my phone out in the Norf Stand to watch replays of exactly what went on!

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Match Fred V Vale

By FingersLilyToday 20:41Today at 20:41:39In response to Match Fred V ValeTop of thread

Views: 115

What an incredibly strange half of football! Does anyone know why the goal was disallowed? The referee took ages to make the decision!

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Match Fred V Vale

By ChudsToday 20:50Today at 20:50:48In response to Re: Match Fred V ValeTop of thread

Views: 35

Their striker (accidentally) tripped Pidge on the edge of the box, which is why he was totally unmarked to tap it in. Believe the fourth official advised the ref to disallow it.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Match Fred V Vale

By RockyBottomToday 20:51Today at 20:51:57In response to Re: Match Fred V ValeTop of thread

Views: 22

Unlike the 4th Official to make a call like that!

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Match Fred V Vale

By ChudsToday 20:54Today at 20:54:08In response to Re: Match Fred V ValeTop of thread

Views: 3

Yep, fortunately!

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Match Fred V Vale

By HITCHIN CALLINGToday 20:43Today at 20:43:26In response to Re: Match Fred V ValeTop of thread

Views: 94

Get Thompson off,they will try to get him booked and a red.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Match Fred V Vale

By Balders (BALDOCKBORO)Today 20:47Today at 20:47:06In response to Re: Match Fred V ValeTop of thread

Views: 65

Disagree, give it 5-10 minutes of the second half, we have to trust our pros to keep their discipline.

Lets see if the game has settled a bit, and then decide, if we need to make the change because it's still frenetic and nasty, then bring on Houghton who can sit and hold the midfield.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Match Fred V Vale

By FreemoToday 20:43Today at 20:43:05In response to Re: Match Fred V ValeTop of thread

Views: 96

Only a brief replay but looked like it might've been a foul on the defender.

Games with unfortunate injuries do have this tendency to get nasty, I'd take an uneventful second half as that was getting chaotic and we deserve to have our noses in front.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Match Fred V Vale

By RockyBottomToday 20:42Today at 20:42:52In response to Re: Match Fred V ValeTop of thread

Views: 94

Think it was for an apparent foul by Gray.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Match Fred V Vale

By LdnptToday 20:42Today at 20:42:44In response to Re: Match Fred V ValeTop of thread

Views: 91

He tripped Pidge as they were running into the box.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Match Fred V Vale

By SevToday 20:46Today at 20:46:31In response to Re: Match Fred V ValeTop of thread

Views: 64

Yep, correct decision. Thankfully the lino/ref didn't bottle it.

Edited by Sev at 20:46:39 on 17th February 2026

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Match Fred V Vale

By FingersLilyToday 20:52Today at 20:52:07In response to Re: Match Fred V ValeTop of thread

Views: 20

Thanks. I was too busy moaning with the bloke next to me on the ET to see what happened. We’ve had a lot of possession but are defending really badly. Lots of individual mistakes & not picking up!

I’m going to say it again - I don’t see what White brings to this team. I’d be much happier with Houghton in midfield.

Dan Phillips is superb yet again!

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Match Fred V Vale

By RockyBottomToday 20:52Today at 20:52:51In response to Re: Match Fred V ValeTop of thread

Views: 15

Houghton or Thompson

Phillips

Kemp

Should be the midfield.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Boro charity

By WASP (Original Mr Wasp)Today 19:56Today at 19:56:06In response to Match Fred V ValeTop of thread

Views: 278

Leaps into action

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person

Re: Boro charity

By SevToday 19:59Today at 19:59:07In response to Boro charity Top of thread

Views: 264

That was somewhat fortunate for them.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Back on track

By WASP (Original Mr Wasp)Today 20:05Today at 20:05:15In response to Re: Boro charity Top of thread

Views: 249

We can’t lose now

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person

Re: Back on track

By FingersLilyToday 20:10Today at 20:10:23In response to Back on trackTop of thread

Views: 242

Looks like a bad injury for Cornick unfortunately

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Back on track

By WASP (Original Mr Wasp)Today 20:11Today at 20:11:15In response to Re: Back on trackTop of thread

Views: 243

Looks awful. Feel for the lad.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Back on track

By FingersLilyToday 20:15Today at 20:15:36In response to Re: Back on trackTop of thread

Views: 212

Gutted. His ankle apparently

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Back on track

By LdnptToday 20:16Today at 20:16:33In response to Re: Back on trackTop of thread

Views: 202

Looks like both his knee and ankle on tv, really bad one poor lad.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Back on track

By RockyBottomToday 20:46Today at 20:46:26In response to Re: Back on trackTop of thread

Views: 62

Ouch! I thought it was just his back on the post, but clearly not!

Edited by RockyBottom at 20:46:37 on 17th February 2026

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Back on track

By SevToday 20:18Today at 20:18:51In response to Re: Back on trackTop of thread

Views: 185

Certainly saw his foot was in the wrong direction. Got stuck in the ground and twisted it right up. Looks horrible. Will be out for a long time. Wishing him a positive road to recovery. Thank you for the goal.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Back on track

By HITCHIN CALLINGToday 20:15Today at 20:15:21In response to Re: Back on trackTop of thread

Views: 211

Broken leg ? Down NS end, best wishes to him.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Back on track

By TucksToday 20:23Today at 20:23:21In response to Re: Back on trackTop of thread

Views: 165

Hard to tell. Didn’t look pretty though, very awkward fall. Wish him well and that it’s not as bad as it first looked.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Back on track

By ChudsToday 20:53Today at 20:53:24In response to Re: Back on trackTop of thread

Views: 11

His ankle was pointing in completely the wrong direction.

That's him joining Ahadme in being done for the season.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Previous thread: Score prediction with GAME ON ? by TelboyToday 11:00Today at 11:00:41view thread