BOROCHAT
Newest article: Re: Match Thread by Northlondonboro Today 16:34Today at 16:34:57view thread
Oldest article: Tech failure by GarstonBoro29/8/2025 14:56Fri Aug 29 14:56:29 2025view thread
Match Thread
Views: 410
Jasper P chopped in half. Deffo red. Ref bottled it
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Match Thread
Views: 70
It’s hard to explain, I don’t think Revs deserves sacking but I really would like a new manager.
It’s been 3 years of the same thing now, hit & hope football, then try and put pressure on the opposition back line to force a mistake and pounce.
How many goals have we scored through good, intricate play? Not many at all. It’s a very dull watch, and when we go through bad phases like we are now it’s borderline unwatchable.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 41
It is dull when we’re out of form but he’s massively overachieving with us. It would be brutal to sack him.
And Wallace would probably hire a fucking idiot like that Exeter twat or Gary Smith.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 111
The Barnsley comms saying how great they are putting 3 past our best defence record.
Forgetting they booted our only right back full on in the fucking head.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 85
I'd have given any to have McGoldrick in our team though. Bloody class at this level.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 225
Nice to hear that I had a hand in our goal!
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 272
As expected, because i'm a tactical genius.
Freestone as right of a back three was a bad move.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 239
It's a back 4 now isn't it?
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: 3-1
Views: 98
First time Marschall has conceded 3+ in a game for us.
Which coincides with it also being the 850th goal we have conceded in the FL.
So that's nice.
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: 3-1
Views: 145
Not the gk. Pidge got completely done.
Time for him to be dropped?
Edited by RockyBottom at 16:13:04 on 31st January 2026
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: 3-1
Views: 143
We have no fit defenders to replace him with. For all we know he could be carrying an injury as well.
Otherwise, yes.
Edited by BasingstokeBoro at 16:15:30 on 31st January 2026
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: 3-1
Views: 122
Think I'd prefer Freestone there atm...
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: 3-1
Views: 103
So whose your fullback then?
Another annoyance, Sweeney had been dispossessed 3 times in the last few minutes and lucky not to concede from his first mistake.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: 3-1
Views: 82
One good performance against a depleted Peterborough and thinks he's Roy of the fucking Rovers. Thick twat.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: 3-1
Views: 93
Would have to be Thompson. Pidge must be injured surely, looks like he can hardly move.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: 3-1
Views: 99
Sweens isn't about to discover the cure for cancer is he? Jesus Christ
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: 3-1
Views: 135
Yes... but again we were completely split open by the through ball. He had to come for it
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 195
Ah, so it is.
That's even more bonkers!
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: 2-1 game back on
Views: 240
Reid did well there
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: 2-1 game back on
Views: 223
What a performance, we can win this 🙃
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: 2-1 game back on
Views: 157
Joking aside, their manager will be fuming as they were in complete control and we've crept back into it a tiny bit.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: 2-1 game back on
Views: 150
Would be huge if we can build on it and get a result out of this.
Louis T to come and slot in at RB, then Cornick to come on and do the business for us to salvage a result. Huzzah!
reply to this article | return to the front page
2 people
Re: 2-1 game back on
Views: 135
Exactly what I would do...
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 232
Do we not have another right footed defender in the squad somewhere?
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 227
Luther injured.
Goode injured.
Pattenden now injured.
Sweeney playing CB.
Unless we played somebody like Okwara, or moved a midfielder into defence, then no.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 211
I'd consider Thompson or Phillips there?
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 190
Agree with Thompson.
Don’t think Phillips positioning is good enough to play a makeshift RB
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 181
Yeah you are probably right!
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 194
Thompson I said below as a suggestion for going there instead of Freestone.
But the question was about defenders.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 138
As soon as Pattenden went down I said Thompson will have to play there. Revs thought overwise.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 182
Bloomin typical we get rid of Nick Freeman when we need him.
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
2-0
Views: 263
This is so far the worst game of the season. Players look like they don’t give a shit.
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: 2-0
Views: 246
Like knife into butter, no challenges, no effort, embarrassing!!!!!
This could be 4 or 5
REVELL OUT
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Losing 1-0
Views: 51
Pidge is SCUM. Drop him IMMEDIATELY.
GET OUT OF OUR CLUB
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Losing 1-0
Views: 50
Get them all out.
Seventh in League One frankly is not good enough, we should be in The Championship by now.
Injuries are no excuse.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Losing 2-0
Views: 244
This could be a cricket score. Every attack they look likely to score and splitting us wide open through the middle.
Revs might need to change the 60min Reid off substitutions plan and do something different... albeit I accept we're a bit stuck with injuries
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Losing 2-0
Views: 244
This could be a hammering. We haven’t started yet
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Losing 2-0
Views: 258
This is fucking pathetic. Sorry no other words for it.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Losing 1-0
Views: 340
Sweeney, Pidge and Freestone all at blame for that. Shame as the formation changed actually looked to have helped us as we were getting torn apart before Pattenden had to go off, but Freestone should never be right back.
Bloody McGoldrick is still so good.
Edited by RockyBottom at 15:20:44 on 31st January 2026
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Losing 1-0
Views: 280
We looked better Tuesday because we were playing against Peterborough’s 3rd string defence.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Losing 1-0
Views: 236
On a narrow pitch. This highlights both our lack of ability on the ball and our footballing IQ off it. Could be an uncharacteristic hammering this, could be 5-0 down already.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Losing 1-0
Views: 323
Torn apart after 4 minutes? Behave
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Losing 1-0
Views: 319
We were.
Should have been 2-0. Woeful defending from the corner with everyone camped on the goalline again.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 365
His foot was about 5ft off the ground, disgusting.
Freestone at right back? That can't be good.
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Match Thread
Views: 224
We have been ruined by injuries this season (Butler, Earley, Luther and now Pattenden) preventing us playing a back three, but you have to say that moving Freestone to RB is madness.
I am fine with moving to a back four, considering the lack of WBs we now have owing to those injuries, but would be far happier with Campbell or Louis T or someone at RB than Freestone!
reply to this article | return to the front page
2 people
Re: Match Thread
Views: 278
Won playing a 5-3-2 Tuesday. Planned to play a 5-3-2 today . Swap Chem for Pattenden and we play the same system with a little bit more of attacking threat . Instead we go back to 4-5-1 , putting Freestone in an unfamiliar position. Thought we should have definitely found a way to keep the same system after it produced our best performance in weeks on Tuesday.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 278
A right footed defender would’ve cleared that chance. He went with his left but couldn’t reach across.
We’re getting battered at the moment. They should’ve left the back 3 alone & put Campbell at right wing back
reply to this article | return to the front page
Previous thread: For Admin by HITCHIN CALLINGYesterday 07:49Yesterday at 07:49:57view thread