BOROCHAT

RYAN DOHERTY TO IPSWICH

By Junction 7 (Junction 7)Today 15:26Today at 15:26:08

Views: 192

On a permanent ?? 🤔🤔

For their under 21s team …

Edited by Junction 7 at 15:28:44 on 30th January 2026

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: RYAN DOHERTY TO IPSWICH

By Sludgy65Today 16:46Today at 16:46:34In response to RYAN DOHERTY TO IPSWICH Top of thread

Views: 50

Being reported locally as I live near Ipswich

Edited by Sludgy65 at 16:46:49 on 30th January 2026

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: RYAN DOHERTY TO IPSWICH

By MerseyBoro (BrummieBoro)Today 15:50Today at 15:50:57In response to RYAN DOHERTY TO IPSWICH Top of thread

Views: 125

A potential record sale (beating Ben Wilmot)?

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: RYAN DOHERTY TO IPSWICH

By imjake7Today 15:33Today at 15:33:25In response to RYAN DOHERTY TO IPSWICH Top of thread

Views: 152

Part of their Academy recruitment...

Wonder what the deal details might be?

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: RYAN DOHERTY TO IPSWICH

By HITCHIN CALLINGToday 15:51Today at 15:51:17In response to Re: RYAN DOHERTY TO IPSWICH Top of thread

Views: 123

Will be undisclosed but going by estimates of other transfers in at least £200,000 range ? Bound also to be sell.on fee

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: RYAN DOHERTY TO IPSWICH

By Saggy68Today 16:45Today at 16:45:50In response to Re: RYAN DOHERTY TO IPSWICH Top of thread

Views: 51

£200k seems cheap. Is that the hoing rate?

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: RYAN DOHERTY TO IPSWICH

By Balders (BALDOCKBORO)Today 17:11Today at 17:11:14In response to Re: RYAN DOHERTY TO IPSWICH Top of thread

Views: 12

Is he going there as a groundsman?

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: RYAN DOHERTY TO IPSWICH

By HITCHIN CALLINGToday 16:53Today at 16:53:27In response to Re: RYAN DOHERTY TO IPSWICH Top of thread

Views: 44

Was just going on what think others have said we got in past , hope I am wrong and it's more

reply to this article | return to the front page