BOROCHAT

Return to front page

Newest article: Re: If Revs.... by SevToday 19:59Today at 19:59:14view thread

Oldest article: WATN Edition - *08092025* by imjake78/9/2025 22:31Mon Sep 8 22:31:41 2025view thread

MenuSearch

Next thread: 🎙️SFC POD: Fourth / S7 EP32 by Boromatt22/12/2025 07:51Mon Dec 22 07:51:16 2025view thread

Match thread losing 1-0

By WASP (Original Mr Wasp)20/12/2025 12:55Sat Dec 20 12:55:31 2025

Views: 1553

He was onside just.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Match thread losing 1-0

By RockyBottom20/12/2025 19:30Sat Dec 20 19:30:03 2025In response to Match thread losing 1-0Top of thread

Views: 1057

At least other results were kind to us, although I'm not sure that makes our failure to win more or less annoying.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Match thread losing 1-0

By Sev20/12/2025 19:30Sat Dec 20 19:30:53 2025In response to Re: Match thread losing 1-0Top of thread

Views: 1054

I'd preferred Cardiff to have beaten Lincoln.

I don't believe we are competing with Cardiff but we might be worth Lincoln.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Match thread losing 1-0

By RockyBottom20/12/2025 19:43Sat Dec 20 19:43:16 2025In response to Re: Match thread losing 1-0Top of thread

Views: 1025

Yeah fair point, but at least it keeps them within touching distance of everyone.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Meh! 🫤

By WASP (Original Mr Wasp)20/12/2025 15:29Sat Dec 20 15:29:20 2025In response to Match thread losing 1-0Top of thread

Views: 1248

We just never seemed to stay focused for 90 mins.
I’m not going to pick anyone out as an escape goat, but someone whose name rhymes with Van Tweeny was a major influence on their first goal.
I think Revs should have made the subs straight after they scored. Phoenix was out of puff by then.
Basically this afternoon was like watching a Vauxhall conference match.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Match thread losing 1-0

By RockyBottom20/12/2025 14:24Sat Dec 20 14:24:47 2025In response to Match thread losing 1-0Top of thread

Views: 1351

That's definitely 2 points dropped.

reply to this article | return to the front page

4 people like this 4 people

Re: Match thread losing 1-0

By Tucks20/12/2025 15:15Sat Dec 20 15:15:01 2025In response to Re: Match thread losing 1-0Top of thread

Views: 1249

Don’t know if it is. Suppose it’s dependant on personal definitions.

We weren’t the better team by stretch of the imagination. We shouldn’t have let them back in at 2-1 but not as if we were head and shoulders the better side and they nicked something. For me that’s not dropped points it’s getting no more than our performance merited sadly.

reply to this article | return to the front page

4 people like this 4 people

Re: Match thread losing 1-0

By Sev20/12/2025 16:24Sat Dec 20 16:24:05 2025In response to Re: Match thread losing 1-0Top of thread

Views: 1151

They scored the only non-gifted goal of the game, so from that point of view it's not terrible. But expected a win before the match.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Match thread losing 1-0

By Chuds20/12/2025 14:59Sat Dec 20 14:59:44 2025In response to Re: Match thread losing 1-0Top of thread

Views: 1268

Aye, but nobody expected anything from Stockport so looking bigger picture we would all have taken 4pts from Stockport away and Burton at home.

Not that that helps much in the immediacy and frustration of failing to win from 2-1 to at home today, but a season is 46 matches, not just today.

Conceding three in eight home games, including Bradford and Cardiff who have scored for fun, but then conceding twice to Burton today was more annoying than anything else, even the dropped points.

Edited by Chuds at 15:00:54 on 20th December 2025

reply to this article | return to the front page

4 people like this 4 people

Re: Match thread losing 1-0

By BasingstokeBoro20/12/2025 14:34Sat Dec 20 14:34:27 2025In response to Re: Match thread losing 1-0Top of thread

Views: 1299

Feels like it.

I just don't get the substitutions. Why make a triple change with 2 minutes of injury time left... just why?

We had our chances, but so did they. Defensively just didn't tick today. Apparently we'd only considerd 3 league goals at home all season before today.

reply to this article | return to the front page

2 people like this 2 people

Re: Match thread losing 1-0

By RockyBottom20/12/2025 14:56Sat Dec 20 14:56:13 2025In response to Re: Match thread losing 1-0Top of thread

Views: 1259

Those substitutions were very strange!

Although frustrating, I'd still prefer that than trying to grind out a 0-0.

Edited by RockyBottom at 15:00:53 on 20th December 2025
Edited by RockyBottom at 15:01:34 on 20th December 2025
Edited by RockyBottom at 15:01:41 on 20th December 2025
Edited by RockyBottom at 15:07:31 on 20th December 2025

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Match thread losing 1-0

By Balders (BALDOCKBORO)20/12/2025 15:09Sat Dec 20 15:09:46 2025In response to Re: Match thread losing 1-0Top of thread

Views: 1230

Was the foul on Reid late on just outside the box a foul or did he take a dive?

Ref was giving him (and everyone else.to be fair) absolutely nothing from minute 1 so why he kept going over and throwing his arms up i dont know. Battle, give a bit back and stay on your feet.

reply to this article | return to the front page

3 people like this 3 people

Re: Match thread losing 1-0

By Tucks20/12/2025 15:12Sat Dec 20 15:12:52 2025In response to Re: Match thread losing 1-0Top of thread

Views: 1220

Think it would have been given more often than not but haven’t seen it back. Ref let the game flow, would rather a ref who does that than a whistle happy clown any day.

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person

Re: Match thread losing 1-0

By RockyBottom20/12/2025 15:12Sat Dec 20 15:12:17 2025In response to Re: Match thread losing 1-0Top of thread

Views: 1219

He let a lot go both ways. Probably got bored of him going down easily and moaning at him.

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person

Re: Match thread losing 1-0

By RockyBottom20/12/2025 13:21Sat Dec 20 13:21:30 2025In response to Match thread losing 1-0Top of thread

Views: 1401

Typical Boro, after the cracking win at Stockport come crashing down against Burton.

God I miss TVC.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Match thread losing 1-0

By SFCfox20/12/2025 14:30Sat Dec 20 14:30:09 2025In response to Re: Match thread losing 1-0Top of thread

Views: 1296

I fear your memories of TVC are 100% blinkered.

His passing wasn't ever good.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Match thread losing 1-0

By Copes (CDawg)20/12/2025 13:19Sat Dec 20 13:19:50 2025In response to Match thread losing 1-0Top of thread

Views: 1424

lol

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Match thread losing 1-0

By RockyBottom20/12/2025 12:56Sat Dec 20 12:56:26 2025In response to Match thread losing 1-0Top of thread

Views: 1466

Terrible defending...

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Match thread losing 1-0

By Sev20/12/2025 12:56Sat Dec 20 12:56:24 2025In response to Match thread losing 1-0Top of thread

Views: 1469

And Sweeney could have easily got to the ball first but decided raising his arm was the better option. Fuck sake

reply to this article | return to the front page

6 people like this 6 people

Re: Match thread losing 1-0

By Tucks20/12/2025 12:59Sat Dec 20 12:59:10 2025In response to Re: Match thread losing 1-0Top of thread

Views: 1441

Play to the whistle. Minimum requirement.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Match thread losing 1-0

By RockyBottom20/12/2025 12:56Sat Dec 20 12:56:44 2025In response to Re: Match thread losing 1-0Top of thread

Views: 1455

and then jogged slowly back.

reply to this article | return to the front page

1-1 Reidy!

By Deltic 21 (Spirit of East Coast Boro)20/12/2025 13:37Sat Dec 20 13:37:14 2025In response to Re: Match thread losing 1-0Top of thread

Views: 1361

Get in!

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person

Re: 1-1 Reidy!

By RockyBottom20/12/2025 13:50Sat Dec 20 13:50:01 2025In response to 1-1 Reidy!Top of thread

Views: 1331

Stepped up this half!

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: 2-1 OGy

By Sev20/12/2025 13:53Sat Dec 20 13:53:06 2025In response to Re: 1-1 Reidy!Top of thread

Views: 1354

Better take Sweeney off now and shore up the defence.

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person

Re: 2-2

By Sev20/12/2025 13:55Sat Dec 20 13:55:28 2025In response to Re: 2-1 OGyTop of thread

Views: 1363

Too late.

Lovely cross from TVC 😔

Edited by Sev at 13:56:01 on 20th December 2025

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: 2-2

By RockyBottom20/12/2025 14:00Sat Dec 20 14:00:41 2025In response to Re: 2-2Top of thread

Views: 1349

I love Luther but wish our fullbacks could cross like that.

Well it's more enjoyable than a 0-0 anyway!

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: 2-2

By RockyBottom20/12/2025 14:02Sat Dec 20 14:02:54 2025In response to Re: 2-2Top of thread

Views: 1351

Oh great Lubala's on! please come back to haunt me

Edited by RockyBottom at 14:03:05 on 20th December 2025

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: 2-2

By HITCHIN CALLING20/12/2025 15:19Sat Dec 20 15:19:43 2025In response to Re: 2-2Top of thread

Views: 1222

Don't wont tu be part of his anti brigade but I would have brought Young or Malcolm on
.

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person

Re: 2-2

By Balders (BALDOCKBORO)20/12/2025 15:49Sat Dec 20 15:49:48 2025In response to Re: 2-2Top of thread

Views: 1175

A few observations from the first live game ive attended this season

Saxon was my MOTM. Quality. Need to keep him fit.

We waste so much ball with long diagonals out to no-one from the CBs. Early on we played neat progressive triangles down the flanks 3-4 times, we need to trust Luther and whoever plays LB to be able to link up with the wide attackers and progress the ball up the pitch

Doherty looked a bit bullied, eased out of contention for high balls by bigger players but never hid, always showing for the ball, if he (maybe understandably) played it safe too often.

Pheonix looked short of confidence and rarely ran at his man with conviction, and if he isn't going to beat his man, there's little point him being there. Ran a lot though and can put a cross in.

Houghton does soo much organising and closing space of the ball. Him and Louis T are a class above.

Edited by BALDOCKBORO at 15:50:00 on 20th December 2025

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person

Re: 2-2

By RockyBottom20/12/2025 19:27Sat Dec 20 19:27:48 2025In response to Re: 2-2Top of thread

Views: 1016

'' We waste so much ball with long diagonals out to no-one from the CBs''

That was far from the worst game from them as well. 100% the most frustrating part of our game.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: 2-2

By Balders (BALDOCKBORO)20/12/2025 19:35Sat Dec 20 19:35:04 2025In response to Re: 2-2Top of thread

Views: 1001

I see enough of us on TV to know we revert to it a lot.

But watching it live enables you to see the other short and wide options we could choose instead.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: 2-2

By vinnyhen20/12/2025 19:13Sat Dec 20 19:13:41 2025In response to Re: 2-2Top of thread

Views: 1040

First one for me too for a while...if that's top 6 standard I dont see us stating there too long. White was the only quality, before then we couldn't string 2 passes together and everyone knocks Sweeney but the number of hospital passes he was given. Very disappointed, I actually thought Burton were the better team.

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person

Re: 2-2

By SFCfox21/12/2025 21:40Sun Dec 21 21:40:34 2025In response to Re: 2-2Top of thread

Views: 808

White and Houghton will have us cooking again. It really is a top 6 partnership.

Agree regarding Sweeney, plus their number 10 didn't stop pressing the defence all game. However, Goode will rightly slot back in to the defence vs Dons

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: 2-2

By Rob SBFC (Big Robbie (SBFC))21/12/2025 19:08Sun Dec 21 19:08:43 2025In response to Re: 2-2Top of thread

Views: 821

I agree. Burton looked decent

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: 2-2

By Balders (BALDOCKBORO)20/12/2025 19:36Sat Dec 20 19:36:05 2025In response to Re: 2-2Top of thread

Views: 1000

I travel from France... what's your excuse living in Bedfordshire Vinny?

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: 2-2

By Sev20/12/2025 16:24Sat Dec 20 16:24:50 2025In response to Re: 2-2Top of thread

Views: 1153

Saxon is another people rave about but I don't see him being any better than Butler or Freestone.

Doherty is 5th choice midfielder so not sure why he is starting ahead of others.

Our pitch is small/narrow so playing with Phoenix and Campbell at home doesn't work for me. Also means you haven't got that option off the bench when you need a spark. Bench was pretty week today.

Edited by Sev at 16:26:13 on 20th December 2025

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person

Re: 2-2

By RockyBottom20/12/2025 19:28Sat Dec 20 19:28:36 2025In response to Re: 2-2Top of thread

Views: 1008

Agree about the pitch. It's definitely more effective away from home on a wider pitch.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: 2-2

By Balders (BALDOCKBORO)20/12/2025 16:50Sat Dec 20 16:50:33 2025In response to Re: 2-2Top of thread

Views: 1121

Saxon is better going forward than Freestone. Intelligent enough to spot and play 1-2 balls and looks forward rather than backward.

I like Freestone but he's not a full back. He's a very good L1 CB doing a decent defensive-minded job at LB when needed.

Saxon is quicker than both Freestone and Butler. And as good defensively as Butler. Shame he's made of glass.

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person

Re: 2-2

By Sev20/12/2025 16:55Sat Dec 20 16:55:09 2025In response to Re: 2-2Top of thread

Views: 1137

Going forward yes, but I was thinking of defending. Like my defenders to defend first and any attacking stuff is a bonus, but not to the detriment of defending.

Defence look pretty poor today, would be stronger as a unit with Goode and Freestone, rather than Sweeney and Earley.

reply to this article | return to the front page

2 people like this 2 people

Re: 2-2

By RockyBottom20/12/2025 19:45Sat Dec 20 19:45:57 2025In response to Re: 2-2Top of thread

Views: 1007

But we might not have created as much? I rate Saxon but not convinced he's as good as the first time he was here. Think the injuries have taken a bit from him. He's still first choice left back for me.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: 2-2

By Balders (BALDOCKBORO)20/12/2025 18:15Sat Dec 20 18:15:33 2025In response to Re: 2-2Top of thread

Views: 851

Pheonix was never gonna be much help to his FB, Chem does a little bit more but at home I want my wingers in the opposition half as much as possible.

And I want Luther and Saxon to take it in turns to offer an overlap, leaving the other one back with the CBs and Houghton.

reply to this article | return to the front page

2 people like this 2 people

Re: 2-2

By Deltic 21 (Spirit of East Coast Boro)20/12/2025 18:56Sat Dec 20 18:56:21 2025In response to Re: 2-2Top of thread

Views: 819

Balders for manager.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Other results OK for us

By Deltic 21 (Spirit of East Coast Boro)20/12/2025 19:01Sat Dec 20 19:01:25 2025In response to Re: 2-2Top of thread

Views: 860

A draw today - annoying though it was - wasn’t so bad for us in terms of other results, with Cardiff, Bradford, Barnsley and Bolton all losing. I think we’d take a day of both Cardiff & Bradford losing, even if we didn’t fully capitalise on it.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Previous thread: Attendance yesterday by Steve 197021/12/2025 18:28Sun Dec 21 18:28:36 2025view thread