BOROCHAT

Orford

By Wrighty8/11/2025 09:36Sat Nov 8 09:36:19 2025

Views: 911

Just read that Carlton Cole who looks after West Ham loans is considering taking Lewis Orford back in January because of his lack of playing time.
I think we may have missed a good player here as he is very highly rated at West Ham.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Orford

By bcb19948/11/2025 15:16Sat Nov 8 15:16:19 2025In response to OrfordTop of thread

Views: 721

Jack Jebb was highly rated at Arsenal. It doesn’t mean much.

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person

Re: Orford

By Owen B8/11/2025 15:19Sat Nov 8 15:19:33 2025In response to Re: OrfordTop of thread

Views: 716

Don't mention his name. The memories, the memories. aarrgghh

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person

Re: Orford

By Tucks8/11/2025 13:27Sat Nov 8 13:27:59 2025In response to OrfordTop of thread

Views: 752

A couple of bad results and people have resorted to waffle.

We can’t justify changing a winning team just because someone lazily called him the next Declan Rice once.

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person

Re: Orford

By Owen B8/11/2025 12:07Sat Nov 8 12:07:26 2025In response to OrfordTop of thread

Views: 787

If he's worth giving game to, he'll play in the next few weeks. I presume he's been acclimatising to a more robust game in training. He did come on as sub vs Reading.

If he's not worth a spot in the team, then he can go back to West Ham...

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person

Re: Orford

By Pete (PeteH)8/11/2025 10:43Sat Nov 8 10:43:16 2025In response to OrfordTop of thread

Views: 826

Well, the counter arguments to his lack of playing time are:

1. League One is a very different kettle of fish to the PL U23s, but he can get kicked to kingdom come if West Ham want.
2. He hasn't shown or done enough to warrant more time.

EDIT: Also, being highly rated by West Ham is worth tuppence.

Edited by PeteH at 10:43:27 on 8th November 2025

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person

Re: Orford

By HITCHIN CALLING8/11/2025 12:34Sat Nov 8 12:34:15 2025In response to Re: OrfordTop of thread

Views: 748

If it's no 1 why sign him.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Orford

By Tucks8/11/2025 13:30Sat Nov 8 13:30:01 2025In response to Re: OrfordTop of thread

Views: 740

As cover. In theory an England Under-20 international should have something about him. Doesn’t mean he should walk straight into our team. Especially when we’re winning games and the players in his position are performing well.

If Louis hadn’t been injured we probably wouldn’t have signed Orford in the first place.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Orford

By Balders (BALDOCKBORO)8/11/2025 14:01Sat Nov 8 14:01:55 2025In response to Re: OrfordTop of thread

Views: 734

And Louis will likely be back competing for a spot when we next play, albeit on the bench initially.

So with Dan P and Louis T as our midfield subs, Orford likely won't even get a seat on the bus as the 'spare' sub

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Orford

By Chuds8/11/2025 15:02Sat Nov 8 15:02:12 2025In response to Re: OrfordTop of thread

Views: 727

Phillips has been diabolical the past two games, though.

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person

Re: Orford

By Balders (BALDOCKBORO)8/11/2025 16:30Sat Nov 8 16:30:21 2025In response to Re: OrfordTop of thread

Views: 660

Yup.

reply to this article | return to the front page