BOROCHAT

Return to front page

Newest article: Re: EFL Trophy by ChudsToday 23:01Today at 23:01:18view thread

Oldest article: IFollow Audio by Saggy6827/4 14:39Sun Apr 27 14:39:51 2025view thread

MenuSearch

FAO Whammers

By Balders (BALDOCKBORO)Today 18:31Today at 18:31:36

Views: 533

Lewis is starting... happy now.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: FAO Whammers

By Pete (PeteH)Today 21:26Today at 21:26:26In response to FAO WhammersTop of thread

Views: 203

"He's getting game time and scoring - recall him immediately! We need him!"

reply to this article | return to the front page

EFL Trophy

By ChudsToday 21:18Today at 21:18:35In response to FAO WhammersTop of thread

Views: 236

Only the second time we have topped the group, and only the second time we have won all three matches.

Scored 12 goals in the group, which is five more than our best in the previous nine years of there being a group stage.

Three debutants today and two players scoring their first goal for the club.

£50k won in prize money.

A home tie in the next round, to be drawn in November and played in December.

Edit: The only downside is Butler being booked, meaning he is suspended for the next round.

Edited by Chuds at 21:19:31 on 21st October 2025

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person

Re: EFL Trophy

By CloggerToday 21:56Today at 21:56:57In response to EFL TrophyTop of thread

Views: 153

Jovan Malcolm has something - a touch of class. Good athlete. Takes up good positions. Good on the turn, and a direct runner

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person

Re: EFL Trophy

By SevToday 22:00Today at 22:00:45In response to Re: EFL TrophyTop of thread

Views: 129

Hard to tell against these type of sides in this type of game but took his goal well, and looked to have something there. Tried a bit too hard at times I felt. Not sure he'll have an amazing career with us, but nice option to have and hopefully pushing the likes of Reid in training to higher standards.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: EFL Trophy

By ChudsToday 21:58Today at 21:58:11In response to Re: EFL TrophyTop of thread

Views: 133

Aye, him and Lubala both starting to get up to speed and look like a couple of good signings now.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: EFL Trophy

By RockyBottomToday 21:34Today at 21:34:32In response to EFL TrophyTop of thread

Views: 184

Is the the prize for coming top? A home tie.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: EFL Trophy

By ChudsToday 21:42Today at 21:42:42In response to Re: EFL TrophyTop of thread

Views: 167

£20k for competing.
£10k per win (£5k if a draw) in the group stage.

£20k if we win the next round.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: EFL Trophy

By Balders (BALDOCKBORO)Today 21:47Today at 21:47:43In response to Re: EFL TrophyTop of thread

Views: 153

Realistically when you take accounts of player win bonuses, security, staff and Keith's laundry bill, £10k probably doesn't even cover the cost of hosting a game.

How much are tickets and how many are we getting now at these games?

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: EFL Trophy

By ChudsToday 23:01Today at 23:01:18In response to Re: EFL TrophyTop of thread

Views: 27

Usually 600-900 at home. £12/£10/Free.

All expenses are covered (including away travel) prior to any gate receipts then being shared between the clubs, and the central pool.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: EFL Trophy

By AndyCToday 22:54Today at 22:54:59In response to Re: EFL TrophyTop of thread

Views: 31

Kids were free tonight. Attendance 617 inc 83 away

Edited by AndyC at 22:55:22 on 21st October 2025

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: EFL Trophy

By RockyBottomToday 21:46Today at 21:46:55In response to Re: EFL TrophyTop of thread

Views: 151

Very nice!

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: EFL Trophy

By ChudsToday 21:48Today at 21:48:35In response to Re: EFL TrophyTop of thread

Views: 154

Would be £260k prizemoney if we win the whole thing, plus a nice share of Wembley gate receipts.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: FAO Whammers

By RockyBottomToday 20:39Today at 20:39:54In response to FAO WhammersTop of thread

Views: 318

I'll say it now, he's not the next Rice.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: FAO Whammers

By SFCfoxToday 21:32Today at 21:32:18In response to Re: FAO WhammersTop of thread

Views: 164

If he was, he wouldn't be on loan to us!

He's here for a reason. Probably to experience first team football for a few months.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: FAO Whammers

By SevToday 20:53Today at 20:53:29In response to Re: FAO WhammersTop of thread

Views: 285

Can't see him breaking into the first team any time soon based on that performance.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: FAO Whammers

By NorfolkIANToday 20:58Today at 20:58:35In response to Re: FAO WhammersTop of thread

Views: 281

Not watched the game but a goal and two assists appears to contradict the above views on LO. Not a reflection of his overall performance?
Edit: just realised the comments may be to wind up Whammers!

Edited by NorfolkIAN at 20:59:48 on 21st October 2025

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: FAO Whammers

By SevToday 21:12Today at 21:12:47In response to Re: FAO WhammersTop of thread

Views: 230

No wind up.

Looked a bit nervy early on. Heavy touches, didn't really do a lot.

Fairly simple assist for Phoenix goal which was all about the finish. Don't recall another.

His goal was basically a tap in after great work from Doherty and even then I think he miss-hit it against the defender but luckily creeped in.

He wasn't bad, but against an open, fairly average U21 side he didn't stand out as anything special. Phoenix stood out as being far better than that level.

He's a bit like White when we first got him. Will need a year or two to develop and become accustomed to men's football in League One.

Why anyone would want him in ahead of White I do not know, after White is having his best season so far. It'd be backwards step.

Edited by Sev at 21:13:03 on 21st October 2025

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: FAO Whammers

By RockyBottomToday 21:35Today at 21:35:35In response to Re: FAO WhammersTop of thread

Views: 164

Yeah I said the same to my dad, very much like White when he first came to us.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: FAO Whammers

By ChudsToday 21:02Today at 21:02:43In response to Re: FAO WhammersTop of thread

Views: 262

Nah, he genuinely did not impress me at all.

White and Houghton miles ahead of him.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: FAO Whammers

By jayessToday 21:05Today at 21:05:45In response to Re: FAO WhammersTop of thread

Views: 255

Doherty as well on that showing.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: FAO Whammers

By ChudsToday 21:15Today at 21:15:12In response to Re: FAO WhammersTop of thread

Views: 219

Yep, our group all said Doherty was the standout midfielder today, ahead of Phillips and Orford.

Deserved that goal after doing all the hard work too, shame it was saved for Orford to then score instead.

Don't get me wrong, Orford obviously has talent and it was his first game, but I am seeing a lot of our mostly younger fans raving about him today, but he didn't stand out for me and made a lot of errors. Reminds me of Finlay Burns, who our younger fans raved about but who I thought was actually quite shit (not saying Orford is) and worse than what we already had (Louis Thompson) so shouldn't have started ahead of them. On that showing, we ought to stick with Houghton and White in midfield.

Edited by Chuds at 21:16:06 on 21st October 2025

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: FAO Whammers

By RockyBottomToday 21:38Today at 21:38:08In response to Re: FAO WhammersTop of thread

Views: 151

Today reminded me of why I dislike Sweeney and Phillips so much.

That said a good work out for the second XI.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: FAO Whammers

By jayessToday 21:20Today at 21:20:49In response to Re: FAO WhammersTop of thread

Views: 189

The pace and intensity of a League One game would leave Orford for dead right now. Docherty has made a few first tema appearances and is beginning to look the part. It takes time...

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: FAO Whammers

By NorfolkIANToday 21:19Today at 21:19:33In response to Re: FAO WhammersTop of thread

Views: 194

Obviously you can’t go by match stats alone. The Hammers fans complaining about him not starting should read this thread.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: FAO Whammers

By jayessToday 21:21Today at 21:21:58In response to Re: FAO WhammersTop of thread

Views: 186

The way Hammers are playing at the moment he would probably walk into their first team.

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person

Re: FAO Whammers

By Balders (BALDOCKBORO)Today 20:55Today at 20:55:26In response to Re: FAO WhammersTop of thread

Views: 273

Same for TAH.

Crazy dash out of his box. Too desperate to impress maybe?

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: FAO Whammers

By RockyBottomToday 21:38Today at 21:38:54In response to Re: FAO WhammersTop of thread

Views: 144

He had to come out. If he doesn't it's a goal, he had zero cover that would have got there.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: FAO Whammers

By ChudsToday 21:23Today at 21:23:12In response to Re: FAO WhammersTop of thread

Views: 179

Something has happened to Taye (maybe to be expected after hardly playing for two years).

I am not sure either of our GKs is good enough. If we want to be promoted anyway. They are fine to just exist in League One.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: FAO Whammers

By SevToday 21:30Today at 21:30:11In response to Re: FAO WhammersTop of thread

Views: 162

Luckily we have an exceptional back line to protect the keeper from a lot. But I agree, I'd much rather have Murphy Cooper or Taye from two years ago.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: FAO Whammers

By ChudsToday 19:18Today at 19:18:47In response to FAO WhammersTop of thread

Views: 435

They really have unnecessarily riled you, you childish buffoon.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: FAO Whammers

By ChudsToday 19:33Today at 19:33:03In response to Re: FAO WhammersTop of thread

Views: 409

12 different scorers in 15 matches for us thus far this season, not including own goals.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: FAO Whammers

By SevToday 19:13Today at 19:13:39In response to FAO WhammersTop of thread

Views: 440

So far missed a good headed chance and a heavy first touch to lose possession 🤣

I'm sure he'll grow into it.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: FAO Whammers

By MerseyBoro (BrummieBoro)Today 19:01Today at 19:01:31In response to FAO WhammersTop of thread

Views: 456

And the belated return of Saxon Earley!

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: FAO Whammers

By ChudsToday 19:19Today at 19:19:44In response to Re: FAO WhammersTop of thread

Views: 419

He played two weeks ago.

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person

Re: FAO Whammers

By NorfolkIANToday 19:36Today at 19:36:30In response to Re: FAO WhammersTop of thread

Views: 388

Yep, against Bromley. Is he playing centre back again?

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: FAO Whammers

By SFC-ChrisToday 19:45Today at 19:45:25In response to Re: FAO WhammersTop of thread

Views: 363

He is, with Butler at left back.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: FAO Whammers

By RockyBottomToday 19:39Today at 19:39:42In response to Re: FAO WhammersTop of thread

Views: 386

God I love watching Pheonix.

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person

Previous thread: Ask Phil Thread by HITCHIN CALLING24/7 15:02Thu Jul 24 15:02:16 2025view thread