BOROCHAT
Newest article: Re: Bolton Match Postponed by ChudsToday 15:25Today at 15:25:47view thread
Oldest article: George Clarke
by HitchinBoro exCalling 22/5 11:10Thu May 22 11:10:15 2025
10 peopleview thread
Next thread: Luton tickets by Deltic 2129/9 18:23Mon Sep 29 18:23:45 2025view thread
Re: Match Thread
Views: 704
Shame White is on a booking now, he's been our best player.
Edited by RockyBottom at 16:02:54 on 4th October 2025
reply to this article | return to the front page
Luton fans in the ET
Views: 881
Quite a few of them
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Luton fans in the ET
Views: 817
Perhaps not as bad as the wanker next to me who said he really follows Arsenal and did not realise Ronnie retired yrs ago ,have to laugh.
reply to this article | return to the front page
2 people
Re: Luton fans in the ET
Views: 229
Yeah, sorry about that.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Luton fans in the ET
Views: 518
Bad taste to laugh at someone who must have spent a few years in a coma
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 824
1 Marschall
2 James-Wildin
4 Houghton
6 Sweeney
10 Kemp
15 Goode
16 Freestone
18 White
19 Reid
20 Campbell
30 Lubala
Subs:
3 Butler
8 Phillips
9 Ahadme
11 Roberts
13 Ashby-Hammond
17 Pattenden
44 Phoenix
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 805
TBH assumed Freestone would be there in place of Sweeney with Butler at LB.
PS no Orford ,not even played for us yet ? If not injured won't be here long.
Edited by HITCHIN CALLING at 14:46:49 on 4th October 2025
reply to this article | return to the front page
Please, please, please
Views: 884
Let there be a traffic warden along BHW during the match.
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Please, please, please
Views: 702
C'mon the boro 2-0
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Please, please, please
Views: 668
With cherries on top
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Please, please, please
Views: 344
Had to laugh at this comment from the Outlaws forum, I think they were at a different game.
"In fact I'd even argue that we were slightly better but they were big, ugly, and brutal - their physicality making up for their more agricultural approach"
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Please, please, please
Views: 194
Proof that we see what we want to see and our preconceptions create a bias.
He only noticed the long balls, the Fouls and the aerial challenges, because that's what he was programmed to notice from the past and the lazy media.
Edited by BALDOCKBORO at 11:14:41 on 5th October 2025
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Please, please, please
Views: 339
Did love the bit where he was complaining about how they have too many resources and were better as underdogs.
I mean I get it sort of but imagine complaining your club is TOO rich
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Please, please, please
Views: 240
Assume then they will have no problem paying comp to their Man as also seems lots want him out
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Please, please, please
Views: 218
It was good to see their fans reaction at the end, all screaming blue murder at their players and staff. Tee-hee.
reply to this article | return to the front page
2 people
Previous thread: Anyone prepared to suggest a score prediction? by Deltic 213/10 23:56Fri Oct 3 23:56:30 2025view thread