BOROCHAT

Return to front page

Newest article: Re: We Are NOT Top of the League by SevYesterday 20:46Yesterday at 20:46:46view thread

Oldest article: Lucas Akins by Copes 4/3 16:39Tue Mar 4 16:39:54 2025view thread

MenuSearch

We Are NOT Top of the League

By imjake7Yesterday 14:26Yesterday at 14:26:37

Views: 905

Cardiff hav just beaten Luton...

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: We Are NOT Top of the League

By FreemoYesterday 17:20Yesterday at 17:20:07In response to We Are NOT Top of the LeagueTop of thread

Views: 605

This is a shit season and I hate it

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: We Are NOT Top of the League

By SevYesterday 14:27Yesterday at 14:27:36In response to We Are NOT Top of the LeagueTop of thread

Views: 854

Revs out.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: We Are NOT Top of the League

By RockyBottomYesterday 17:25Yesterday at 17:25:23In response to Re: We Are NOT Top of the LeagueTop of thread

Views: 585

Great battling effort today, I personally just thought it was crying out for Gas to come on earlier, as the whole the the first half it kept coming straight back and you felt momentum was building for them. Also wish we'd leave someone up at defensive corners as well, especially with this new 8 second rule. No disgrace in that performance though, did us proud. Still a million miles more entertaining than last year.

reply to this article | return to the front page

3 people like this 3 people

Re: We Are NOT Top of the League

By SevYesterday 19:18Yesterday at 19:18:21In response to Re: We Are NOT Top of the LeagueTop of thread

Views: 357

Agreed. Top effort but no outlet up top and nothing stuck. Just kept coming back and they dominated possession and play up to their goal.

When Ahadme and Phoenix (and Sweeney and Phillips for that matter) came on it was a different game. We looked really good, with lots of lovely play between Phoenix, Kemp and White mostly.

I know by Huddersfield had stopped playing so take it with a pinch of salt but it would be superb to watch the style of the last 15 minutes all game/all season. Probably would leave us defensively open when the other side isn't just defending a one goal lead though.

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person

Re: We Are NOT Top of the League

By SFCfoxYesterday 19:49Yesterday at 19:49:08In response to Re: We Are NOT Top of the LeagueTop of thread

Views: 326

They have CB Joe Low, he played for Wycombe last season.

I think it's no coincdence how Wycombe lose him and they're now struggling.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: We Are NOT Top of the League

By RockyBottomYesterday 19:41Yesterday at 19:41:44In response to Re: We Are NOT Top of the LeagueTop of thread

Views: 320

Phoenix is a great impact sub off the bench when they are tiring. He's so hard to stop with the ball at his feet and uses it intelligently. I think Chem think started as he makes us more solid defensively.

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person

Re: We Are NOT Top of the League

By Balders (BALDOCKBORO)Yesterday 20:16Yesterday at 20:16:38In response to Re: We Are NOT Top of the LeagueTop of thread

Views: 261

Chem was our best player IMO. Going forward and tracking back.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: We Are NOT Top of the League

By FreemoYesterday 17:44Yesterday at 17:44:01In response to Re: We Are NOT Top of the LeagueTop of thread

Views: 528

Agree the ball wasn't sticking up top, not sure we had the quality for Gass coming on earlier to be the decider though. Phoenix looked promising.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: We Are NOT Top of the League

By RockyBottomYesterday 18:29Yesterday at 18:29:17In response to Re: We Are NOT Top of the LeagueTop of thread

Views: 413

Pheonix is great and did well, but it was very much a like for like change. We needed someone to bully their cbs.

Edited by RockyBottom at 18:29:23 on 23rd August 2025

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: We Are NOT Top of the League

By MerseyBoro (BrummieBoro)Yesterday 17:41Yesterday at 17:41:57In response to Re: We Are NOT Top of the LeagueTop of thread

Views: 514

Agree with all that and I feel that Revs was still far more proactive with the changes than in similar situations last season. Didn't quite come off in the final third today.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: We Are NOT Top of the League

By Balders (BALDOCKBORO)Yesterday 17:41Yesterday at 17:41:25In response to Re: We Are NOT Top of the LeagueTop of thread

Views: 519

We stayed in the game and showed flashes of creativity.

Very happy with the spirit and performance overall.

A few minor gripes around decision-making, our right hand side looking exposed and Roberts (again), but play like that and we'll be fine.

They're a decent outfit. So are we.

Marachall getting done again for holding the ball... sort that out

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: We Are NOT Top of the League

By jayessYesterday 20:19Yesterday at 20:19:19In response to Re: We Are NOT Top of the LeagueTop of thread

Views: 276

We were good on the whole, and got significantly better after the substitutions (not least because Roberts simply didn't turn up). Apart from holding the ball too long, Marschall was excellent today.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: We Are NOT Top of the League

By SevYesterday 20:46Yesterday at 20:46:46In response to Re: We Are NOT Top of the LeagueTop of thread

Views: 263

He did also fumble two crosses. Not saying that negates the good he did, he did some good saves and seems a decent enough keeper. Just if it was Taye who fumbled two ball we'd not hear the last of how bad he is etc from some.

Good to have two good keepers.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: We Are NOT Top of the League

By SevYesterday 19:15Yesterday at 19:15:29In response to Re: We Are NOT Top of the LeagueTop of thread

Views: 339

The annoying thing about that 8 second rule is he is waiting for the players to get forward. It disadvantages teams who kick long, fine if you play short, you can release straight away but you have to wait for everyone to run 40 yards before you can kick it.

Also, you're fine spending 20 seconds taking a thrown, goal kick, corner or free kick and the ref doesn't hurry you up.

I like the idea but maybe 10 seconds would be better and just annoying it only one minor aspect of time wasting being addressed.

No excuses for keepers though because the ref clearly counts it down with his fingers in the air.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: We Are NOT Top of the League

By Jonnym8Yesterday 20:16Yesterday at 20:16:29In response to Re: We Are NOT Top of the LeagueTop of thread

Views: 261

‘Also, you're fine spending 20 seconds taking a thrown, goal kick, corner or free kick and the ref doesn't hurry you up.’

This makes the rule an absolute farce. I like the concept but it needs to be applied to all elements of the game otherwise it’s pointless.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: We Are NOT Top of the League

By MerseyBoro (BrummieBoro)Yesterday 20:08Yesterday at 20:08:54In response to Re: We Are NOT Top of the LeagueTop of thread

Views: 263

Would like the same 8 second rule to apply for throw-ins, goal kicks and indirect free kicks too. It's actually a good innovation for a change.

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person

Re: We Are NOT Top of the League

By RockyBottomYesterday 18:31Yesterday at 18:31:01In response to Re: We Are NOT Top of the LeagueTop of thread

Views: 401

He gets done because we bring everyone back and he has zero option of where to distribute it quickly, other than to aimlessly launch it up to no one. Putting one player up stops that.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: We Are NOT Top of the League

By Sludgy65Yesterday 18:34Yesterday at 18:34:03In response to Re: We Are NOT Top of the LeagueTop of thread

Views: 381

If we leave a man up top for corners the opposition will bring 2 men back to cover. It's a win win situation but I don't understand why clubs don't do it?

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: We Are NOT Top of the League

By RockyBottomYesterday 19:43Yesterday at 19:43:14In response to Re: We Are NOT Top of the LeagueTop of thread

Views: 300

Plus our keeper dropped a catch twice today because the area was so bloody crowded. Overall thought he was very good today in fairness and pulled off some important saves.

Edited by RockyBottom at 19:43:20 on 23rd August 2025
Edited by RockyBottom at 19:47:33 on 23rd August 2025

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person

Re: We Are NOT Top of the League

By Jonnym8Yesterday 17:57Yesterday at 17:57:42In response to Re: We Are NOT Top of the LeagueTop of thread

Views: 473

Went for a point, looked good for it. Got done and changed it up. Looked ok but not enough quality to nick a point. The classic catch 22. Top 10 attitude/ performance.

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person

Previous thread: Shrewsbury goalie by Balders20/8 19:57Wed Aug 20 19:57:32 2025view thread