BOROCHAT
Newest article: Re: Neil’s Substack article on the relationship be… by Owen BYesterday 20:27Yesterday at 20:27:45view thread
Oldest article: A minute silence today on 7th minute for Tim Jolly
by Big G.5/4 12:36Sat Apr 5 12:36:16 2025
2 peopleview thread
Next thread: Fines by Sev10/8 18:11Sun Aug 10 18:11:17 2025view thread
Jovan Malcolm
Views: 2053
Looks as though we’ll be announcing this signing in next day or so: https://www.sunderlandecho.com/sport/football/non-league/gateshead-forward-closing-in-on-league-one-move-5264724
Credit Reece for spotting this. See his twitter .
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Jovan Malcolm
Views: 807
Someone needs to show him how shorts should be worn.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Jovan Malcolm - confirmed
Views: 1346
This reminds me of when we signed three or four strikers from non league and none of them turned out too good.
Not to say this will be the same, just reminded me of that season.
Marsh, Akinfenwa, Effiong and Dinanga.
reply to this article | return to the front page
5 people
Re: Jovan Malcolm - confirmed
Views: 1104
Remember when we signed a post hip operation Romain Vincelot?
One of our better players that season too! This must've tipped PW and the board over the edge to change our transfer policies.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Jovan Malcolm - confirmed
Views: 1125
How very dare you speak about Inih like that!
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Jovan Malcolm - confirmed
Views: 1256
Would have been a good frontline in the National League if the EFL appeal to effectively demote Macclesfield had failed that summer (2020).
reply to this article | return to the front page
2 people
Re: Jovan Malcolm - confirmed
Views: 1142
Ah yeah it was the year when we didn't know which league we would be playing in. I was quite excited at the prospect of them all tearing up the Conference, but I guess remaining in League Two worked out well in the end.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Jovan Malcolm - confirmed
Views: 1251
This is different, he's the missing piece for PROMOTION
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Jovan Malcolm
Views: 1690
If true be good to have another striker option. Know nothing of him, but must be the right fit for the club if we are paying good money.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Jovan Malcolm
Views: 1153
On this unusually the club have given quite a lot of detail on the contract.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Jovan Malcolm
Views: 1181
Was highly thought of at WBA when in the youth set up. But i guess like a lot of youngsters didn't progress how they wanted. Lets hope he's a late developer.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Jovan Malcolm
Views: 1445
he is not the marquis signing, Wallace and Revs was on about, in theory he is another striker hyped up a bit like Pressley when we signed him
reply to this article | return to the front page
2 people
Re: Jovan Malcolm
Views: 1325
I thought we’d bought Lubala as a striker to sit on the bench? I would have thought we needed another centre midfielder ahead of a reserve striker
reply to this article | return to the front page
3 people
Re: Jovan Malcolm
Views: 1052
From his brief cameo at Blackpool, I wouldn't get too excited by Lubala.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Jovan Malcolm
Views: 974
I thought he looked alright. Energetic and positive.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Jovan Malcolm
Views: 1031
Obviously not match fit plus assume has a knock so too early to decide.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Jovan Malcolm
Views: 1075
We have a lot of players that “can” play striker, but I think Reid is our only fit “genuine striker” (until now)
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Jovan Malcolm
Views: 1091
The days of the traditional centre forward seem to be on way out at most levels it seems.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Jovan Malcolm
Views: 1151
According to Fotmob He also plays on the wings or attacking midfield. Also says he’s 6’0” and he looks a bit of a unit. Sounds a bit like Tyreece.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Jovan Malcolm
Views: 1027
I hope that's the only similarity
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Jovan Malcolm
Views: 1385
John Marquis?
reply to this article | return to the front page
2 people
Re: Jovan Malcolm
Views: 1344
Marquis of Lorne?
reply to this article | return to the front page
3 people
Re: Jovan Malcolm
Views: 1428
Presley, like Apere are average League 2 strikers. Scottish strikers should be avoided
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Jovan Malcolm
Views: 1629
Agree and was not in their line up yesterday,so possibly true Must admit would be a punt but sometimes they work out .
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Jovan Malcolm
Views: 1300
Didn't we get Yemi Odubade from Gateshead?
I loved him.
Proper happy player. Charged about really quickly couldn't hit a barn door most of the time.
Or is that where he went?
reply to this article | return to the front page
4 people
Re: Jovan Malcolm
Views: 1269
We have not, through the years, had enough players who specialised in running really fast.
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Jovan Malcolm
Views: 1231
We got Yemi from Oxford. He went to the Heed.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Jovan Malcolm
Views: 1224
Knew there was a connection.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Jovan Malcolm
Views: 1272
we got Paul Thompson from there, then he got injuryed and missed most of the season
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Jovan Malcom (second l removed)
Views: 1263
"Impressive 9 goals in 37 games" for Gateshead 🙄
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Jovan Malcom (second l removed)
Views: 573
Did you like Danny Rose?
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Jovan Malcom (second l removed)
Views: 1047
Everything I can see online says Malcolm, not Malcom ?
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Jovan Malcom (second l removed)
Views: 1047
Why remove 2nd “L”?
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Jovan Malcom (second l removed)
Views: 1071
A lot were frm the bench, and he scored 8 from February onwards. Gateshead and WBA fans also seem to think highly of him, which is enough for me. We've had plenty of strikers with good goalscoring records turn absolute dross after getting here after all
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Jovan Malcom (second l removed)
Views: 1206
He'll get far better service with us.
And face better defences
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Jovan Malcolm (second l restored)
Views: 1002
Shouldn't really have taken this as gospel but did see it in the wording of the URL link here 🤦🏻♂️
/www.stevenagefc.com/news/2025/august/11/stevenage-sign-jovan-malcom-/?fbclid=IwQ0xDSwMHEyJjbGNrAwcTHGV4dG4DYWVtAjExAAEeSg9YG85TbfiCShPSLq31xSZ4hdCA2a7lfuOPGJHU72fKwTLshKGk4rToWaE_aem_QqMkAElE_7_pQcL4SM-LbQ
Edited by Statto at 19:20:48 on 11th August 2025
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Jovan Malcolm (second l restored)
Views: 844
Trust the club to get it wrong 😆 🤣
reply to this article | return to the front page
Previous thread: Charlton match tonight by WASP12/8 15:03Tue Aug 12 15:03:45 2025view thread