BOROCHAT
Newest article: Re: Pre-Season Schedule by bcb1994Today 00:51Today at 00:51:16view thread
Oldest article: Score prediction Boro v $Cancer on football$ by WASP27/1 18:45Mon Jan 27 18:45:42 2025view thread
Next thread: Flags by 60218/5 12:15Sun May 18 12:15:10 2025view thread
Satisfaction levels
Views: 1270
No words just numbers and a +,- or = symbol required.
Out of 100, how satisfied are you with the season.
And assuming we have the same manager will we be a bit better next season, a bit worse, or about the same (+ - or = )
For me 60 -
In a few days if it gets a few sensible replies I'll do some analysis and average it out. Or forget I ever posted it. One of the two.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Satisfaction levels RESULTS
Views: 615
27 numerical responses on satiafaction levels for this season:
2 scores under 40
4 under 50
15 scored 60 or higher
4 scored 70 or higher
Surprisingly positive.
21 +-= responses:
13 -
4+
4=
Clear majority anticipate us doing worse next season.
I'll run this again after our PSFs and the bulk of our squad changes.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Satisfaction levels RESULTS
Views: 621
Just checked the @_BoroStats poll that was run immediately before our opening match of this season.
From 347 votes:
7% said 1st-6th.
27% said 7th-12th.
56% said 13th-18th.
10% said 19th-24th.
So the majority of all voters, and the clearest section by a mile, were spot on.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Satisfaction levels RESULTS
Views: 508
The wisdom of crowds.
Even though our performances have been iffy, I think the satisfaction skews positive because our end position is broadly in line with most people's expectations.
Would be interesting to see what this looks like in a year's time.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Satisfaction levels RESULTS
Views: 529
7% were Farley accounts.
reply to this article | return to the front page
2 people
Re: Satisfaction levels RESULTS
Views: 556
I think I predicted 20th on here so whilst we ran rings around that target, our points tally was much closer to that than to a surprise play-off run.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Satisfaction levels RESULTS
Views: 581
I think i was in that bracket.
But given how miserable most of the feckers are on here after every loss or blank in the goals scored column, i expected a lower satisfaction level.
But maybe it's a bit confirmation bias and the moaners always shouting a bit louder.
The lack of confidence that next season will be as good or better is roughly where i thought it'd be.
More Rotterdam than Farley.
Edited by BALDOCKBORO at 12:54:50 on 6th May 2025
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Satisfaction levels RESULTS
Views: 401
The thing we’ve got to ask when predicting next season is how well we expect Revs to improve. What has he learnt? What will he do differently to improve results? If he has those skills, why didn’t he use them this season? The sad fact for me is that unless he has some major new ideas in his locker, based on what he’s learnt from this season, then I don’t see where the improvement will come from. Assuming he was giving it his all this season, then all we can expect is a 12-16th finish. Plus other teams will have worked us out so fresh ideas needed to advance. Let’s hope he’s got them.
reply to this article | return to the front page
3 people
Re: Satisfaction levels RESULTS
Views: 515
I am in Rotterdam tomorrow.
I don't plan on being in Farley any time soon.
reply to this article | return to the front page
3 people
Re: Satisfaction levels RESULTS
Views: 515
What about Liverpool or Rome?
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Satisfaction levels RESULTS
Views: 507
Could be anywhere.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Satisfaction levels RESULTS
Views: 507
But Home.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Satisfaction levels RESULTS
Views: 553
He who shouts loudest often has the least to say.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Satisfaction levels RESULTS
Views: 530
Why did you not post that in CAPS?
I'm disappointed.
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Satisfaction levels
Views: 604
50
Did the bare minimum, which was survival. Rev's needs to show me he can adapt.
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Satisfaction levels
Views: 575
The bare minimum would've been 20th place, surely. 14th is just average.
Edited by Sev at 11:01:54 on 6th May 2025
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Satisfaction levels
Views: 640
55=. Just above 50% for that fantastic long weekend away at Barnsley & Wrexham.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Satisfaction levels
Views: 802
25 for staying up
5 for 'entertainment'
Total: 30
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Satisfaction levels
Views: 752
One less than I scored them. My extra point was for Sweens goal last week
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Satisfaction levels
Views: 805
37.5
Worse than last season, and most the football been boring with little excitement but we stayed up which is the main thing
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Satisfaction levels
Views: 1009
67
+
I think we'll strengthen over the summer and expect a fair amount of churn in the squad. Time to freshen things up.
reply to this article | return to the front page
2 people
Re: Satisfaction levels
Views: 1021
I hope so, but would be very surprised if there is much change beyond what we already know/expect.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Satisfaction levels
Views: 987
65
+ for next season, league should be a bit easier with the change in clubs and Revell has another year experience under his belt. Not much change in position though, 11th - 14th.
Edited by AndyC at 17:24:27 on 4th May 2025
Edited by AndyC at 17:26:34 on 4th May 2025
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Satisfaction levels
Views: 999
65 -
Plus and minus points (this season):
+ Solid league position
+ Stable squad
+ EFL Trophy run
- Playing style/entertainment value
- Lack of goals
- FA Cup performance
reply to this article | return to the front page
5 people
Re: Satisfaction levels
Views: 1005
65, just below mid table is a good return.
= For next season, develop the squad and get better in the final third would be a +
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Satisfaction levels
Views: 1098
75 -
Anyone who thinks we should be play off contenders with our resources every season is deluded. Solid midtable is at least a B-, to confuse your scoring system
Edited by Owen B at 13:15:14 on 4th May 2025
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Satisfaction levels
Views: 584
75
I said at the beginning of the season I would be happy if we stayed up.
However I would like some more goals and more attacking intent....
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Satisfaction levels
Views: 574
50-
Can’t fault staying up, some superb results against bigger teams, and the fact that I do think Revs has got more than a clue about good management. Can fault some poor performances, not hugely exciting, and that Revs doesn’t always seem to have a clue about good management. Very unsure about next season but tend towards the negative.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Previous thread: Cooperman by Telboy18/5 08:46Sun May 18 08:46:08 2025view thread