BOROCHAT
Newest article: Re: 3pm football Blackout by SevYesterday 23:03Yesterday at 23:03:09view thread
Oldest article: Sometimes it can take many years
by Copeysaurus4/12/2024 09:19Wed Dec 4 09:19:37 2024
1 personview thread
Next thread: Same old shit by Stevenage fan2/4 01:31Wed Apr 2 01:31:20 2025view thread
Match Fred
Views: 1333
Is that an unchanged line-up?
Looks it to me. Doesn't happen often.
Why wouldn't you, they did so well last outing...
Murphy
LJW
Pidge
Goode
But
King
Louis
Roberts
Kemp
Reid
Hanlan
Edited by BALDOCKBORO at 19:22:32 on 1st April 2025
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Match Fred
Views: 594
I mean last night was rubbish, but why is everyone shitting the bed about a dead rubber?
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Fred
Views: 427
the womens cup final against Royston was more exciting
It had goals, passion, commitment and tension
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Fred
Views: 448
Imagine a cup final demonstrating more passion, commitment and tension than a dead rubber league match near the end of the season when we have nothing to play for.
MIND. BLOWN.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Fred
Views: 504
Dead rubber? This is a football team, not the council.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Fred
Views: 458
I wod not have said to Brian Clough or Bill Shankly this is a nothing game and seen their reaction.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Fred
Views: 510
Precisely *because* it was a dead rubber.
No nerves. No jeopardy. So why not play with a bit of flair.
How are we going to perform when there *is* a bit of pressure? That is what concerns me a little for next season.
Revs talks about how professional, tight, competitive and determined the 'group' is, the work ethic and the bravery. The basic traits you need when it all comes on top in a bad run of form.
Are we seeing any of that the last month or so?
reply to this article | return to the front page
5 people
Re: Match Fred
Views: 504
I'm not particularly worried but I did find out last night that our form over the last 12 games is only better than Shrewsbury's.
reply to this article | return to the front page
2 people
Re: Match Fred
Views: 524
Because it’s concerning for next season.
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Match Fred
Views: 499
The same was said last season!
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Fred
Views: 527
Maybe because fans that fork out money might actually like to see some entertainment once in a while.
reply to this article | return to the front page
3 people
Re: Match Fred
Views: 528
The vast majority of football fans fork out money for 10 years watching not the best entertainment, for that 1 amazing season. That's what makes it an amazing season.
We've only just had ours 2 years ago, plus first half of last season, so got a while of watching this football until we can expect to have another amazing one.
We have had a lot of decent performances this season to entertain us - the home game v Stockport was one of them for example
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Match Fred
Views: 515
We do once in a while...we are not money bags Birmingham.
The sooner we become realists the sooner we'll become more content.
Edited by Telboy at 08:55:03 on 2nd April 2025
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Match Fred
Views: 533
It isn't just Birmingham or Wrexham.
Huddersfield lost £15mil.
Bolton lost £11mil.
Barnsley lost £9.6mil.
Stockport lost £7m.
Wycombe lost £3.8mil.
Cambridge lost £2.6m.
All announced in the past week.
People need to seriously realise what we are competing against here. The football is dull and Revs seriously needs to offer up more entertainment and goal threat, but we NEED more of a dose of reality from our fans rather than pissing their pants and wanting us to buy these magical super player we cannot afford or sack our manager after every defeat.
reply to this article | return to the front page
8 people
Re: Match Fred
Views: 472
^^ this
Don't get me wrong, I thought last night was shite. But the 'Revs out' stuff is laughable. The same people who were adamant we were going down this season, where we're basically safe with the best part of a quarter of the season left
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Match Fred
Views: 486
Agree on all the points you make but think we deserve at least a bit more entertainment.At moment at least seems we are just hoping to keep a clean sheet and nick a goal.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Fred
Views: 474
Like most fans on here, I would like to see a bit more excitement. For the most part we are lack lustre so an improvement on the playing side is definitely needed. If we can manage that and retain our mid table position then I would be pretty content with everything else.
reply to this article | return to the front page
2 people
Re: Match Fred
Views: 513
For me there's no real game plan, we don't shoot and it's extremely boring.
Dead rubber or not, it's not good enough.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Fred
Views: 525
It’s not last nights match per se, it’s the continual rubbish that is served up week on week. It’s mind numbingly boring.
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Match Fred
Views: 536
Because we care.
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
In depth tactical analysis
Views: 800
Bit fucking shit that
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Fred
Views: 820
You can see why Stockport are challenging for the playoffs and we're not.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Zero shots on target again
Views: 837
That’s Revball.
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Match Fred
Views: 921
I don’t care if they get back at like 2am this morning
Get em in at 9am tomorrow for extra training and some f*cking shooting practice ffs
Abysmal
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Fred
Views: 845
2AM? YOUR HAVING A LAUGH THEY TAKE 1HR TO SHOWER AND GET CHANGED MORE LIKE 4AM !!!!
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Fred
Views: 835
They better sleep on the coach then
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Match Fred
Views: 1009
Alright. I’ll be the first to say Goode is not very good.
reply to this article | return to the front page
2 people
Re: Match Fred
Views: 972
Our best defender left in January
reply to this article | return to the front page
2 people
Re: Match Fred
Views: 1020
Do us all a favour wallace and sack Revell
EVANS is available
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Match Fred
Views: 812
Rotherham magically win the first game after Evans left. It's as if he was a hindrance on that team.
reply to this article | return to the front page
5 people
Re: Match Fred
Views: 1044
So fucking boring AGAIN.
I'm refusing to give any body the free ticket for Saturday. Even my worst enemies don't deserve to watch this.
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Match Fred
Views: 1049
0 shots on target again tonight.
0 shots on target against Orient on Thursday.
For a former striker, Revs teams do play some boring anti attacking football don’t they.
reply to this article | return to the front page
2 people
Re: Match Fred
Views: 1055
Don’t think it’s a lack of trying. We just have shit players
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Fred
Views: 1011
I don't think any of the front three deserve to be starting.
reply to this article | return to the front page
2 people
Re: Match Fred
Views: 714
Dan Kemp must be fucking fuming.
Busts a gut and demands the ball for 90 minutes week in week out and is surrounded by players daydreaming about Dubai for a few weeks now.
reply to this article | return to the front page
5 people
Re: Match Fred
Views: 711
Imagine how bad we will be if/ when Kemp moves on in the summer.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Fred
Views: 696
Then White will get that role 🤣
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Fred
Views: 696
I remember when we were shit before we had Dan Kemp.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Fred
Views: 695
I'm sure even in the relegation seasons and at the bottom of League Two we were more enjoyable to watch.
First 10mins tonight we showed some promise and then just died.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Fred
Views: 671
No. I was there. We weren't.
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Match Fred
Views: 248
Can confirm that Sampson ball and Tisdale ball were utterly dreadful to watch.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Fred
Views: 250
And Sheringham ball. And Westley ball, countless times over. And Evans ball, albeit was successful for the most part.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Fred
Views: 265
Can we just confirm that lower league football is shit to watch, but when we win games we enjoy it, and that's all that matters?
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Match Fred
Views: 251
Yes.
And that the weather also plays a huge impact, so tomorrow will be enjoyable even when Crawley complete the double over us, which I am convinced they will, made even sweeter by the big odds offered on them doing so.
LET'S GO METS!
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Fred
Views: 342
Same, that was properly dire 💩
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Fred
Views: 585
I thought we moved the ball around quite crispy, 70% pass success rate and decent possession first half.
But only in the first two thirds of the pitch.
Then we lost any intent. Kemp dropped very deep and ventured wide to get himself on the ball at every opportunity.
They should have been 2 up by HT at least and they weren't brilliant.
Second half the game was quite open with both sides getting forward more but only Stockport creating clear chances thanks to our lack of protection for the back 4, Charlie Goode being on a poor run of form/confidence and no-o e wanting to take an early shot.
At least we tried to change it up with 30 minutes to go, moving Reid central when Hanlan went off for List.
OK it didn't work.
Which begs the question why move Reid inside to replace Hanlan, he's either better than Hanlan, in which case start him there, or he's not, so don't rotate him into that slot.
I can understand changing shape and putting him up top *alongside* Hanlan for the last 30 when we were chasing, but not the rotation. Pick your best striker and replace him with a *fresh* one when he's tired, don't replace him with the out of form striker you've played wide all game because you didn't trust him to play central.
Edited by BALDOCKBORO at 06:32:43 on 2nd April 2025
Edited by BALDOCKBORO at 06:37:36 on 2nd April 2025
reply to this article | return to the front page
4 people
Re: Match Fred
Views: 354
or replace Hanlan with wither of two centre forwards - Young or Appere
Young come on and played him wide, he is a centre forward not a winger
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Match Fred
Views: 338
Young not great in training so has to play out wide
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Fred
Views: 479
It's very reminiscent of Gary Smith with the 'look decent for 20 minutes, never get a shot on target' approach.
Last time we went there we just humped it long for 90 minutes and still lost by a goal less.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Fred
Views: 499
Reid and Roberts don't deserve to be starting on current form and attitude.
I'm still not convinced Hanlan is good enough either.
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: losing 1-0
Views: 1048
Guy is all left foot and we show him inside.
For the love of god can we please start Young over Hanlan?
reply to this article | return to the front page
3 people
Re: losing 1-0
Views: 1116
Poor defending!!! They all just stood there....this will be 3 or 4 if we aint careful
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: losing 1-0
Views: 1030
They had a warning shot just before that. Did they learn from it? nope just leave Butler 1 v 1 again and hope for the best.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: losing 1-0
Views: 1109
Imagine if we tried shooting, we might get some luck like that.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: losing 1-0
Views: 1114
We don’t have a single player who can make a run like that into the box.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: losing 1-0
Views: 1087
We have Edwards and Young...Edwards injured but where is Young? Can only assume he ran over Revs cat!
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: losing 1-0
Views: 1072
We have forwards that could all score goals but none seem to be able to score goals in this system. Do you try and find better forwards who are good enough to score in this system, or do you change the system to give them tap ins, headers in the box or opportunities shots from cut backs and knock downs.
Reckon it would be easier to do the latter than find a great forward who we can afford and is willing to come to us.
Or do you just keep doing the same and hope they get better at playing this way.
Edited by Sev at 20:27:00 on 1st April 2025
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: losing 1-0
Views: 920
What exactly is our system? No matter how many times I watch this team I struggle to understand what we are trying to do
reply to this article | return to the front page
5 people
Re: losing 1-0
Views: 852
No idea, just assumed it was too complicated for me to understand, me being someone who just wants to play 442, kick the ball forward and down the wings and get crosses into the box. Far too simple. Revs has a much more complex system that players at this level don't have the football brains to carry out.
Seems to be pass it around, with Kemp being the "man". Whilst it makes Kemp look good the rest of the team have no clue / talent to play whatever the ultimate goal is.
It'll keep us up, so depends how much risk v reward everyone wants.
reply to this article | return to the front page
2 people
Re: losing 1-0
Views: 839
We better work something out over the summer otherwise we're going down next season.
reply to this article | return to the front page
3 people
Re: losing 1-0
Views: 787
If the next 7 continue like this I'd agree. But we'll probably somehow win a couple and then everything will seem "ok" again.
It's what we do, look clueless and shit for a spell of games, then find some form, then go back to looking shit and so on. Enough to keep us in that 12th to 16th bracket.
If we played like we do some games all season then yeah, we be fucked.
reply to this article | return to the front page
2 people
Re: losing 1-0
Views: 847
I long for the days of wingers who hugged the touch line and got to the bye line.
There seems to be no clear patterns to any of our play. It’s almost like our players don’t know what they’re supposed to be doing……..
reply to this article | return to the front page
2 people
Re: losing 1-0
Views: 897
Pass, pass, pass, pass, give it away
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: losing 3-0
Views: 912
Stockport could have easily had more.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: losing 1-0
Views: 914
Taken off arguably one of our better players in King, but Reid and Roberts are still out there.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Fred
Views: 1202
1-0 down early
Hammer them for most of the 2nd half without testing the keeper.
First sub in the 80th minute
Final score 1-0 defeat.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Fred
Views: 1056
Is Pidge wearing a blood sugar monitor? Never noticed it before under a bandage.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Previous thread: 🎙️SFC POD: thwarted / S6 EP63 by Boromatt3/4 06:37Thu Apr 3 06:37:28 2025view thread