BOROCHAT
Newest article: Re: Bristol Rovers and Crawley Down by MerseyBoroToday 08:39Today at 08:39:18view thread
Oldest article: Sometimes it can take many years
by Copeysaurus4/12/2024 09:19Wed Dec 4 09:19:37 2024
1 personview thread
Next thread: Tyrece Shade by Sludgy6520/2 13:07Thu Feb 20 13:07:55 2025view thread
Cambridge sack Garry Monk
Views: 1286
To be expected
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Cambridge sack Garry Monk
Views: 502
Appoined Neil Harris AND Mark Bonner!
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Cambridge sack Garry Monk
Views: 499
BOGOF?
Didn't Harris leave them in the lurch as soon as Millwall came sniffing last time?
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Cambridge sack Garry Monk
Views: 507
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/c798wgxrdpgo
This must be costing them mega bucks including Monks payoff.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Cambridge sack Garry Monk
Views: 484
They have always been reckless with money
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Cambridge sack Garry Monk
Views: 437
True and realise they get slightly better crowds than us but where is Dosh coming from, no Hollywood FC backer .Assume must have huge debts then
reply to this article | return to the front page
Rotherham
Views: 1082
Perhaps an inevitable link - https://footballleagueworld.co.uk/rotherham-united-eyeing-paul-warne-managerial-reunion-after-derby-county-exit/
Would be a little ironic if Revs outlasts Evans though
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Rotherham
Views: 912
Evans would simply get off the managerial merry-go-round at The Abbey, nice and close to home.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Rotherham
Views: 805
Or possibly Evans waits and thinks PW likely to invite him to return for next season ?
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Rotherham
Views: 775
I'd take Evans back as a firefighter if we're in the position that Cambridge currently are. Not while comfortably in mid-table though.
reply to this article | return to the front page
2 people
Re: Rotherham
Views: 764
But even if we finish mid table so might think can Revs push on next season , hence changing at end of season.Not saying Evans would guarantee this but could be part of PW's thinking.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Rotherham
Views: 606
Not a chance.
Edit: That PW cans Revs this summer to replace him with Evans, I mean, not the pushing on bit.
Edited by Chuds at 13:37:22 on 18th February 2025
reply to this article | return to the front page
4 people
Re: Rotherham
Views: 753
We were poor for the last 3 months under Evans last season.
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Rotherham
Views: 385
I'm sure the current squad would get a huge morale boost from seeing Evans back...
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Rotherham
Views: 778
No thanks. I think he's shown throughout his career that he has a limited shelf life, around two seasons, before falling off a cliff. With some of the same players still here, I can't see a reappointment being a success at all.
reply to this article | return to the front page
4 people
Re: Rotherham
Views: 784
You may be right on your final.comment but still might happen especially if Revs and co are on rolling contracts so no compo to pay out
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Rotherham
Views: 777
While we're safe in mid table, I'd be happy to stick with Revs, despite inconsistency frustrations.
reply to this article | return to the front page
2 people
Re: Rotherham
Views: 835
Should think the Peterborough job will be coming available soon as well
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Rotherham
Views: 788
Peterborough have history of appointing the same managers over and over as well
Edit: Wallace would never do something like that here...
Edited by BrummieBoro at 08:48:36 on 18th February 2025
reply to this article | return to the front page
2 people
Previous thread: 4 years ago this week. by WASP20/2 08:48Thu Feb 20 08:48:39 2025view thread