Newest article: Re: Peterborough by BaldersToday 21:18Today at 21:18:18view thread
Oldest article: Neil Banfield by PuddingPigs9/5 11:17Thu May 9 11:17:35 2024view thread
Next thread: 6 years today by ForestBoro3515/9 12:46Sun Sep 15 12:46:38 2024view thread
This forum
Views: 1512
Just wondered what year did the admins create this forum? I remember reading it as early as 2003. I remember every evening the first thing I'd look on when logging on the Internet was Borochat and remember some names on here that no longer post.
Jasper
Jozza
Thora
Borodaddy
Gezmurrary
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: This forum
Views: 968
Me and MarkE (Miss Europa and JaSpEr) set this place up in 2002. Much missed posters IMO include BoroGent, Dippers and Mook.
Oh, and GLENN WATSON.
Edited by PeteH at 09:11:39 on 10th September 2024
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: This forum
Views: 1235
I think it was JaSpEr (MarkE) and Miss Europa (Pete) who originally began it so you'll have to hope one of them sees this and can provide some answers.
I think this particular version of Borochat forum started in 2015 when Hoagy (conf forum/Yeovil fan) stopped providing the old one and we moved to footballwebpages.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: This forum
Views: 1154
Talking of which anyone still looking at Conference Forum,I haven't since they switched . Just wondering if they still all hate us or have moved on.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: This forum
Views: 1155
I think it ended about ten years ago. Soapy probably banned everyone
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: This forum
Views: 1138
The people who provide this forum refused to host them because they were such a bunch of bellends any more so they had to find a new place for it.
It's now one of those where you have to click into each topic etc rather than one long list of threads you can scroll down. I can't remember what the technical terms for them are.
If we are ever forced to one of those I will resign, as can't be arsed trying to navigate round those.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: This forum
Views: 903
I just had a look - that's all changed! My old login doesn't work any more, I'm not sure I'll worry about re-signing up.
I'm sure that layout has its merits, but guess we just got used to this way which works for a (relatively) small active membership.
I'm in a few discord servers and that's a different setup again, then there's Facebook groups (although I hardly go on Facebook any longer).
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: This forum
Views: 909
Given that most message boards/forums are that format and this is one of the last around like this, I'm assuming the consensus is that type is much better, but it's not for me.
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: This forum
Views: 907
Yeah probably is, I think this layout is fine with a core of 20ish (guessing) posters
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: This forum
Views: 841
It's done well to survive this long.
What with all the cool kids on Discord-Twitch, MySpace and InstaTikTok-XGram
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: This forum
Views: 760
Football twitter is a mess of spammy bot accounts and opposition fans trolling each other constantly.
At least on here we get real content, like the Monday Lunch Thread or whatever.
reply to this article | return to the front page
2 people
Re: This forum
Views: 826
I much prefer this “message board” style. If a sub-thread is going off on a tangent you can just choose to ignore those posts and read around them. On the more common type of forum you have to scroll through all the waffle and guff to get to the content you actually want to see.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: This forum
Views: 781
There's probably an option to hide threads on those boards too. The benefit of them is that new posts show at the top, whereas on here they don't, so people keep posting the same stuff over and over if they don't scroll down and check all the other threads, and it's easy to miss new stuff posted on old threads here.
The problem with new posts bringing the whole thread to the top is that you get 'Message for Borogent' situations
Edited by AndyC at 14:22:10 on 10th September 2024
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: This forum
Views: 762
There is on the few I’ve frequented but I was referring more to the ability here to choose to not read sub-threads when you see they’re going off on a tangent rather than clicking a button to ignore a thread completely.
On the kind of forum where every post on a thread appears linearly you have to scroll through everything on the thread, including all the stuff you’re not interested in.
On those kinds of forums generally a new post will also bring a thread to the top of the page regardless of when the thread was started too.
There are of course benefits too such as being able to reply en masse to different posts by quoting etc. but I think the system we have here is infinitely better for this forum.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: This forum
Views: 791
You can "collapse threads" in the option and then it sort of works like the other style.
So when there is a new post it would bring that collapsed thread to the top (if you have it set to show latest at the top) and you can click into it to view all.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: This forum
Views: 1045
Yeah I gave up on it within a couple days of the switch. Think I’m still admin on there.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: This forum
Views: 1019
Conf forum used to be a funny read. Very little to do with football though
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: This forum
Views: 1042
The best threads on here veer a long way from football...
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: This forum
Views: 464
To be fair, the team has been known to veer a long way from football, so its probably all still relevant. 😊
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: This forum
Views: 1031
Yes they're mostly about Stevenage FC matches
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: This forum
Views: 1108
Ah thanks for the information.
The old version was much better back then when we were a conference club and always enjoyable to read.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: This forum
Views: 1062
No offence taken 😂
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: This forum
Views: 1195
Thora is too busy supporting Arsenal these days
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: This forum
Views: 1183
*moaning about Partey and refereeing decisions that always go against Arsenal
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: This forum
Views: 1220
I'm still here, just don't really post anything. Not that I ever used to.
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Previous thread: 🎙️SFC POD: Exeter v Boro / S6 EP15 by Boromatt18/9 10:41Wed Sep 18 10:41:22 2024view thread