BOROCHAT
Newest article: Re: Go on then
by jayessYesterday 22:51Yesterday at 22:51:20
1 personview thread
Oldest article: Friday lunch thread by Copeysaurus2/2 13:27Fri Feb 2 13:27:16 2024view thread
Next thread: Footy scran.... by SFC Jonny27/2 11:42Tue Feb 27 11:42:46 2024view thread
H Bomb’s super delayed and very basic Match Thread
Views: 1090
Goal! 1-0 Boro!
Roberts 35.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Full of piss and wind
Views: 673
Grown men making gestures at each other pretending they are tough guys.
If they were that hard they’d have jumped the small fence and slugged it out. They are absolute mouth breathers.
Embarrassing to watch!
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Full of piss and wind
Views: 573
Even the hardest men know they would break like waves on the shore against our elite stewarding operation.
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: H Bomb’s super delayed and very basic Match Thread
Views: 674
Deserved to win. Played some nice football at times. Never feel truly comfortable with a one goal advantage. Reid should get a bollocking for not playing Hemmings in in the second half.
Highlight for me was the boy stood near me on the ET who repeatedly shouted “Butler!” in complete sincerity while sounding like Blakey from On The Buses.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: H Bomb’s super delayed and very basic Match Thread
Views: 620
I agree, that was game over if he makes that pass. That's happened a few times recently with a killer pass not being played, due to players not being aware. It's why they are playing for us and not the likes of Portsmouth or in the Championship.
Overall, thought we did well just needed that second to kill to game off. It's great to see a whole team putting in a shift to grind out a result.
reply to this article | return to the front page
2 people
Re: H Bomb’s super delayed and very basic Match Thread
Views: 609
Yeah, I know Reid is desperate after three without a goal (for the second time - his worst of the season), but that was scandalous.
Totally comfortable performance, where we really should have had another two or three but were wasteful, and where I at no point felt worried about conceding.
Amazed by Cambridge's approach tonight, they gifted us it without us really having to work.
A very professional and comfortable evening's work, and two straight home wins and clean sheets, which was very much needed.
And six straight wins over Cambridge. A good night.
reply to this article | return to the front page
5 people
Re: H Bomb’s super delayed and very basic Match Thread
Views: 621
Deserved win, although a few “moments” during the second half that make it no such a comfortable watch, but an enjoyable one.
Ref was excellent on the whole, couple of odd bookings but managed the game well, especially with the flare in added time.
Fans tonight where the let down. Again the minority but never good to see a mum cradling a youngster having to move from the east terrace into the north through fear. Both sets of fans did not cover themselves in glory tonight and it’s gonna cost the club again in the pocket when the FA letter lands in Wallace’s in tray during the week.
And to the moaning **** in the north if your not happy stay at home and stop moaning..!!!!!!
Edited by RussD81 at 22:47:53 on 27th February 2024
reply to this article | return to the front page
2 people
Re: H Bomb?s super delayed and very basic Match Thread
Views: 603
The steward in the away end on a power trip started all of that.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: H Bomb?s super delayed and very basic Match Thread
Views: 568
Did he throw the flare?
Or the coins and stuff flying both ways?
Stewards may not be great but don't excuse the idiots on either side.
Edited by BALDOCKBORO at 22:59:57 on 27th February 2024
Edited by BALDOCKBORO at 23:00:23 on 27th February 2024
reply to this article | return to the front page
2 people
Re: H Bomb?s super delayed and very basic Match Thread
Views: 547
Was well before the flare. Dragging someone half your size out by his neck, no matter how moronic he was, will not defuse the situation
reply to this article | return to the front page
2 people
Re: H Bomb?s super delayed and very basic Match Thread
Views: 365
No text
Edited by BALDOCKBORO at 09:29:38 on 28th February 2024
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: H Bomb’s super delayed and very basic Match Thread
Views: 633
Hemmings, Robert’s and Pidge were stand out for me. The pass that never happened was criminal
reply to this article | return to the front page
East Terrace Stewarding
Views: 773
The centre section of the East Terrace was very busy with the steps totally blocked. The steward on duty was a young girl who was not able/comfortable in keeping things clear. The senior safety team came by a few times, looked and did nothing.
These steps should have been policed by a senior steward and the young girl moved to the much lower risk are of the North Stand.
reply to this article | return to the front page
5 people
Re: East Terrace Stewarding
Views: 728
Was a pondlife who thought at HT when they comeback I should move because I was exactly where they where 1st half.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: H Bomb’s super delayed and very basic Match Thread
Views: 845
BOOF!
/youtu.be/96NUsT-1k2A?feature=shared
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: H Bomb’s super delayed and very basic Match Thread
Views: 806
Didn't want to say owt beforehand but I thought six points from these last two was essential if we want to be in the playoffs and after a lot of graft we've done just that. I don't see us finishing lower than 7th.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: H Bomb’s super delayed and very basic Match Thread
Views: 760
Agreed, we had to get 6 points from those games, after the previous results. We did :)
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Referee
Views: 900
I'm not at the game tonight but I see that in charge is a former MLS ref. Hows he getting on. I assume better than your average EFL official? Also Andy D'Urso's son running the line.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Referee
Views: 681
Let the game flow. Got more decisions right than wrong too. One of the better refs we’ve had in recent times.
reply to this article | return to the front page
3 people
Re: Referee
Views: 716
Thought he had a good game to be fair. Balanced and hardly noticed him, which is good.
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Referee
Views: 747
Good for the majority. 7/10. Tough game to ref too
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Referee
Views: 587
I'd have rated him higher than that, but thought it was one of the easier games to referee. Arguably that could be because he was doing a good job.
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Referee
Views: 792
Best ref we've seen this season.
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Referee
Views: 860
Yeah I think he's been good, as were the refs at Derby and Vale on the whole. Maybe Steve's psychological warfare is winning out
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: H Bomb’s super delayed and very basic Match Thread
Views: 966
Get in :)
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: H Bomb’s super delayed and very basic Match Thread
Views: 928
Was going to complain about pass selection and quality in the final third but then we scored a good goal so fuck it, so far good. Cambridge won't just bend over though, need to keep it up.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: H Bomb’s super delayed and very basic Match Thread
Views: 708
Cambridge bended over
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: H Bomb’s super delayed and very basic Match Thread
Views: 897
I think we've been ok, some nice passages of play in there. Need that second goal early in the second half and that should do it.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: H Bomb’s super delayed and very basic Match Thread
Views: 852
Need to change it up now, hanging on. I'd take Hemmings off.
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: H Bomb’s super delayed and very basic Match Thread
Views: 834
Stats on the BBC live page indicate otherwise… ?
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: H Bomb’s super delayed and very basic Match Thread
Views: 850
That was Roberts best game for a long, long time.
reply to this article | return to the front page
3 people
Re: H Bomb’s super delayed and very basic Match Thread
Views: 721
Why?
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: H Bomb’s super delayed and very basic Match Thread
Views: 569
His workrate was better, created more/ wasted less, scored.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: H Bomb’s super delayed and very basic Match Thread
Views: 683
Thinking about it their best chances did come from us considerately putting them in
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: H Bomb?s super delayed and very basic Match Thread
Views: 709
Because he was really good today and hasnt been great for the last couple of months
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: H Bomb?s super delayed and very basic Match Thread
Views: 673
Fuck me. I read that as his ‘last game’ for a long time. Christ, I need a lie down.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: H Bomb?s super delayed and very basic Match Thread
Views: 646
Haha fair enough thought it was an odd question!
Shower, glass of Bailey£s and bed, exhausted
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: H Bomb?s super delayed and very basic Match Thread
Views: 676
Good results elsewhere with the other sides in and around playoffs losing. Dare I say it we’re only 7 points off the automatics😀
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: H Bomb?s super delayed and very basic Match Thread
Views: 621
Need to boost our goal differance for that.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: H Bomb?s super delayed and very basic Match Thread
Views: 620
Need to boost our goal differance for that.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Previous thread: Both start then by RockyBottom27/2 18:58Tue Feb 27 18:58:24 2024view thread