Re: Knight signed!
Views: 83
There are plenty of attacking players in the squad for once. While it wouldn’t be ideal there are options that could do a job up front if needed.
Definitely better for Malcolm himself and his chances here in future that he plays regularly.
Knight signed! by NorfolkIANYesterday 12:05Yesterday at 12:05:53
3 peopleview thread- Re: Knight signed! by ChudsYesterday 12:50Yesterday at 12:50:52 5 people
- Re: Knight signed! by HITCHIN CALLINGYesterday 14:30Yesterday at 14:30:44
- Re: Knight signed! by ChudsYesterday 15:02Yesterday at 15:02:55
- Re: Knight signed! by HITCHIN CALLINGYesterday 15:26Yesterday at 15:26:28
- Re: Knight signed! by ChudsYesterday 15:34Yesterday at 15:34:48
- Re: Knight signed! by HITCHIN CALLINGYesterday 15:53Yesterday at 15:53:44
- Re: Knight signed! by ChudsYesterday 15:55Yesterday at 15:55:54 1 person
- Re: Knight signed! by HITCHIN CALLINGYesterday 16:02Yesterday at 16:02:02
- Re: Knight signed! by TucksYesterday 21:20Yesterday at 21:20:35
- Re: Knight signed! by SFCfoxYesterday 13:09Yesterday at 13:09:22
- Re: Knight signed! by BaldersYesterday 13:17Yesterday at 13:17:48 1 person
- Re: Knight signed! by ChudsYesterday 13:14Yesterday at 13:14:08 1 person
- Re: Knight signed! by SFCfoxYesterday 12:10Yesterday at 12:10:26 6 people
- Re: Knight signed! by BaldersYesterday 12:34Yesterday at 12:34:46