Bantamtalk
Views: 317
Just seen this quoted on Bradford’s forum:
“Less than 60 hours to go. So time for some thoughts prior to @The Voice@The Voice producing a review.
Second in the table! Apparently some of their support are suggesting that as a club heading for the top of the Championship (l kid you not), they should be putting away perennial League Two teams. Deluded and totally arrogant comes to mind.
I understand they play a 'strong' game!?
Their second string dispatched thr Crystal Palace Under 2's on Monday, in an emphatic manner. Noteworthy was a certain Jake Young coming on as an 80th minute substitute, but no reference to him doing anything in the game.
They may well be second in the league, but despite that lofty position, they have an exceptionally low level of support. Their gates, often bolstered by complete sell out of the away end (so with City selling over 1,363 tickets around 30% of the crowd) is around 4,300. The capacity of the compact stadium is given as 7,318! Given the bravado about other clubs and their right to be at the top end of the Championship, then a pathetic number, which reflects badly on Stevenage and the surrounding area.
Hopefully we go there and do a job on them.”
Don’t know where it was taken from but I’d seen it on the League One forum as well. Funny how people take one stupid post by one person as being representative of us all!
Bantamtalk by NorfolkIAN ftYesterday 16:59Yesterday at 16:59:11view thread- Re: Bantamtalk by PeteYesterday 20:34Yesterday at 20:34:12
- Re: Bantamtalk by LoyalbantamYesterday 17:43Yesterday at 17:43:55
3 people - Re: Bantamtalk by ChudsYesterday 17:38Yesterday at 17:38:49
1 person - Re: Bantamtalk by FreemoYesterday 17:32Yesterday at 17:32:08
1 person - Re: Bantamtalk by TucksYesterday 17:31Yesterday at 17:31:45
- Re: Bantamtalk by SevYesterday 18:44Yesterday at 18:44:28
- Re: Bantamtalk by AndyCYesterday 18:05Yesterday at 18:05:31
1 person - Re: Bantamtalk by TelboyYesterday 17:43Yesterday at 17:43:38
1 person - Re: Bantamtalk by ChudsYesterday 17:38Yesterday at 17:38:36
- Re: Bantamtalk by TucksYesterday 18:23Yesterday at 18:23:25
- Re: Bantamtalk by AndyCYesterday 18:34Yesterday at 18:34:07
- Re: Bantamtalk by SFCfoxYesterday 17:05Yesterday at 17:05:06
- Re: Bantamtalk by HITCHIN CALLINGYesterday 17:14Yesterday at 17:14:43
- Re: Bantamtalk by BorobubblesYesterday 18:04Yesterday at 18:04:13


