Re: 6 strikers - Do we need that many
Views: 465
4 is a good number to have. As there will be injuries and you don't always want them playing 90 minutes every game. Plus Sanderson is playing out wide at the moment too.
So to have Sanderson, Mellon, Magennis and now the unknown quantity of Turhan, seems like the ideal amount and a good mix of youth and experience.
Roberts, Broggio, Patterson and Campbell can compete for the wide places.
Or if Kemp got injured, for example, then one of all of those would come in. So they'll all get plenty of game time, just maybe not as many starts as some might want.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Next article in this thread: Re: 6 strikers - Do we need that many by Chuds 7/9 08:44Mon Sep 7 08:44:27 2026
That's what you call a squad overhaul by jayess6/9 13:09Sun Sep 6 13:09:43 2026
3 peopleview thread- Re: That's what you call a squad overhaul by Deltic 216/9 23:07Sun Sep 6 23:07:33 2026 3 people
- Re: That's what you call a squad overhaul by jayess7/9 07:46Mon Sep 7 07:46:09 2026 1 person
- 6 strikers - Do we need that many by worrier7/9 08:13Mon Sep 7 08:13:45 2026
- Re: 6 strikers - Do we need that many by Sev7/9 12:10Mon Sep 7 12:10:41 2026
- Re: 6 strikers - Do we need that many by Chuds 7/9 08:44Mon Sep 7 08:44:27 2026 1 person
- Re: 6 strikers - Do we need that many by Balders7/9 12:29Mon Sep 7 12:29:47 2026
- Re: 6 strikers - Do we need that many by SFCfox7/9 10:36Mon Sep 7 10:36:54 2026 1 person
- Re: 6 strikers - Do we need that many by Deltic 217/9 14:08Mon Sep 7 14:08:10 2026 1 person
- Re: 6 strikers - Do we need that many by Deltic 217/9 08:21Mon Sep 7 08:21:07 2026
- Re: 6 strikers - Do we need that many by SFCfox7/9 08:19Mon Sep 7 08:19:41 2026
- Re: 6 strikers - Do we need that many by AndyC7/9 10:51Mon Sep 7 10:51:17 2026
- Re: 6 strikers - Do we need that many by HITCHIN CALLING7/9 08:31Mon Sep 7 08:31:04 2026