Re: 6 strikers - Do we need that many
Views: 69
4 is a good number to have. As there will be injuries and you don't always want them playing 90 minutes every game. Plus Sanderson is playing out wide at the moment too.
So to have Sanderson, Mellon, Magennis and now the unknown quantity of Turhan, seems like the ideal amount and a good mix of youth and experience.
Roberts, Broggio, Patterson and Campbell can compete for the wide places.
Or if Kemp got injured, for example, then one of all of those would come in. So they'll all get plenty of game time, just maybe not as many starts as some might want.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Next article in this thread: Re: 6 strikers - Do we need that many by Chuds Today 08:44Today at 08:44:27
That's what you call a squad overhaul by jayessYesterday 13:09Yesterday at 13:09:43
2 peopleview thread- Re: That's what you call a squad overhaul by Deltic 21Yesterday 23:07Yesterday at 23:07:33 3 people
- Re: That's what you call a squad overhaul by jayessToday 07:46Today at 07:46:09
- 6 strikers - Do we need that many by worrierToday 08:13Today at 08:13:45
- Re: 6 strikers - Do we need that many by SevToday 12:10Today at 12:10:41
- Re: 6 strikers - Do we need that many by Chuds Today 08:44Today at 08:44:27
- Re: 6 strikers - Do we need that many by BaldersToday 12:29Today at 12:29:47
- Re: 6 strikers - Do we need that many by SFCfoxToday 10:36Today at 10:36:54
- Re: 6 strikers - Do we need that many by Deltic 21Today 08:21Today at 08:21:07
- Re: 6 strikers - Do we need that many by SFCfoxToday 08:19Today at 08:19:41
- Re: 6 strikers - Do we need that many by AndyCToday 10:51Today at 10:51:17
- Re: 6 strikers - Do we need that many by HITCHIN CALLINGToday 08:31Today at 08:31:04