Re: Banfield Gone
Views: 57
The first paragraph is where I'm at too. I'd hope that most our fans would appreciate the size of the club compared to the majority in this league, how we're punching well above our weight and even more so with the new financial rules now in play. But that's unrealistic - the nature of modern football plus social media etc means everyone wants everything instantly, and our fans were, as you said, getting annoyed with successful albeit crap football last year. A bad run is only going to bring the Revell naysayers out even more and it could get unpleasant quite quickly. I've always thought we had a relatively patient and sensible fanbase but that shifted a bit last year as people got excited by promotion etc.
I'd hope we'd aim to play more expansively and confidently next year as we saw in glimpses this year, but it's clear that a more defensive first approach works for us and our players, and it's what Revs prefers so it's unlikely to change. If that keeps us in L1 then so be it - I'd love us to take more risks but it's not going to happen.
I'm more worried about bringing in another couple of older/injury prone players in Magennis and Taylor - we started last year being able to leave good players completely out of the squad and ended with Bez being our back up striker option - that's a byproduct of picking up lots of players with sketchy injury records, but also means we probably need quality and numbers, which seems unlikely based on what Revs has said in the last few days. Could be a tricky season - still lots of times to pick up a few more signings but it felt like the recent interviews were managing expectations as much as providing updates
reply to this article | return to the front page
Next article in this thread: Re: Banfield Gone by MerseyBoroYesterday 15:18Yesterday at 15:18:30
Banfield Gone by worrierYesterday 15:13Yesterday at 15:13:23view thread- Re: Banfield Gone by Owen BToday 10:41Today at 10:41:05
- Re: Banfield Gone by MerseyBoroToday 10:46Today at 10:46:47
- Re: Banfield Gone by ChudsYesterday 15:36Yesterday at 15:36:42
4 people - Re: Banfield Gone by SevYesterday 16:44Yesterday at 16:44:39
- Re: Banfield Gone by ChudsYesterday 17:23Yesterday at 17:23:07
- Re: Banfield Gone by SevYesterday 17:39Yesterday at 17:39:30
- Re: Banfield Gone by ChudsYesterday 17:45Yesterday at 17:45:34
1 person - Re: Banfield Gone by SFCfoxToday 11:16Today at 11:16:31
1 person - Re: Banfield Gone by Sludgy65Today 08:27Today at 08:27:43
4 people - Re: Banfield Gone by MerseyBoroToday 09:34Today at 09:34:26
- Re: Banfield Gone by samboroughToday 08:00Today at 08:00:20
- Re: Banfield Gone by TucksToday 10:51Today at 10:51:19
1 person - Re: Banfield Gone by TucksYesterday 18:51Yesterday at 18:51:37
1 person - Re: Banfield Gone by BedsBoroToday 11:16Today at 11:16:38
- Re: Banfield Gone by MerseyBoroYesterday 15:18Yesterday at 15:18:30
- Re: Banfield Gone by HITCHIN CALLINGYesterday 15:18Yesterday at 15:18:06
- Re: Banfield Gone by BaldersYesterday 15:35Yesterday at 15:35:07
- Re: Banfield Gone by rdell15Yesterday 17:42Yesterday at 17:42:33
2 people - Re: Banfield Gone by HITCHIN CALLINGYesterday 15:43Yesterday at 15:43:30
- Re: Banfield Gone by BaldersYesterday 15:55Yesterday at 15:55:38
1 person - Re: Banfield Gone by borostagYesterday 18:19Yesterday at 18:19:44
1 person - Re: Banfield Gone by ChudsYesterday 18:35Yesterday at 18:35:34
1 person - Re: Banfield Gone by jayessYesterday 16:47Yesterday at 16:47:22
1 person


