Re: Knight signed!
Views: 367
Did not say we were Man C etc but cannot then see why Malcolm went then even if the excuse is he is one for the future .EDIT if Simpson was available would have agreed.with you.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Next article in this thread: Re: Knight signed! by Chuds31/1 15:55Sat Jan 31 15:55:54 2026
Knight signed! by NorfolkIAN31/1 12:05Sat Jan 31 12:05:53 2026
3 peopleview thread- Re: Knight signed! by Chuds31/1 12:50Sat Jan 31 12:50:52 2026 5 people
- Re: Knight signed! by HITCHIN CALLING31/1 14:30Sat Jan 31 14:30:44 2026
- Re: Knight signed! by Chuds31/1 15:02Sat Jan 31 15:02:55 2026
- Re: Knight signed! by HITCHIN CALLING31/1 15:26Sat Jan 31 15:26:28 2026
- Re: Knight signed! by Chuds31/1 15:34Sat Jan 31 15:34:48 2026 1 person
- Re: Knight signed! by HITCHIN CALLING31/1 15:53Sat Jan 31 15:53:44 2026
- Re: Knight signed! by Chuds31/1 15:55Sat Jan 31 15:55:54 2026 1 person
- Re: Knight signed! by HITCHIN CALLING31/1 16:02Sat Jan 31 16:02:02 2026
- Re: Knight signed! by Tucks31/1 21:20Sat Jan 31 21:20:35 2026
- Re: Knight signed! by SFCfox31/1 13:09Sat Jan 31 13:09:22 2026
- Re: Knight signed! by Balders31/1 13:17Sat Jan 31 13:17:48 2026 1 person
- Re: Knight signed! by Chuds31/1 13:14Sat Jan 31 13:14:08 2026 1 person
- Re: Knight signed! by SFCfox31/1 12:10Sat Jan 31 12:10:26 2026 6 people
- Re: Knight signed! by Balders31/1 12:34Sat Jan 31 12:34:46 2026