Re: Knight signed!
Views: 176
I always think we signed him from Brentford, but he may have been released just before and therefore a free agent.
And with him I meant more he had good pedigree and top Academy experience like Knight, rather than being young and with the Academy experience so could be sold for big bucks, which is the case when we signed Harvey, and now Knight.
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Next article in this thread: Re: Knight signed! by SFCfoxToday 12:10Today at 12:10:26
Knight signed! by NorfolkIANToday 12:05Today at 12:05:53
3 peopleview thread- Re: Knight signed! by ChudsToday 12:50Today at 12:50:52
3 people - Re: Knight signed! by HITCHIN CALLINGToday 14:30Today at 14:30:44
- Re: Knight signed! by SFCfoxToday 13:09Today at 13:09:22
- Re: Knight signed! by BaldersToday 13:17Today at 13:17:48
- Re: Knight signed! by ChudsToday 13:14Today at 13:14:08
1 person - Re: Knight signed! by SFCfoxToday 12:10Today at 12:10:26
4 people - Re: Knight signed! by BaldersToday 12:34Today at 12:34:46


