Re: FAO Whammers
Views: 250
No wind up.
Looked a bit nervy early on. Heavy touches, didn't really do a lot.
Fairly simple assist for Phoenix goal which was all about the finish. Don't recall another.
His goal was basically a tap in after great work from Doherty and even then I think he miss-hit it against the defender but luckily creeped in.
He wasn't bad, but against an open, fairly average U21 side he didn't stand out as anything special. Phoenix stood out as being far better than that level.
He's a bit like White when we first got him. Will need a year or two to develop and become accustomed to men's football in League One.
Why anyone would want him in ahead of White I do not know, after White is having his best season so far. It'd be backwards step.
Edited by Sev at 21:13:03 on 21st October 2025
reply to this article | return to the front page
Next article in this thread: Re: FAO Whammers by RockyBottomYesterday 21:35Yesterday at 21:35:35
FAO Whammers by BaldersYesterday 18:31Yesterday at 18:31:36view thread- Re: FAO Whammers by PeteYesterday 21:26Yesterday at 21:26:26
- EFL Trophy by ChudsYesterday 21:18Yesterday at 21:18:35
1 person - Re: EFL Trophy by CloggerYesterday 21:56Yesterday at 21:56:57 1 person
- Re: EFL Trophy by SevYesterday 22:00Yesterday at 22:00:45
- Re: EFL Trophy by ChudsYesterday 21:58Yesterday at 21:58:11
- Re: EFL Trophy by RockyBottomYesterday 21:34Yesterday at 21:34:32
- Re: EFL Trophy by ChudsYesterday 21:42Yesterday at 21:42:42
- Re: EFL Trophy by BaldersYesterday 21:47Yesterday at 21:47:43
- Re: EFL Trophy by ChudsYesterday 23:01Yesterday at 23:01:18
- Re: EFL Trophy by AndyCYesterday 22:54Yesterday at 22:54:59
- Re: EFL Trophy by RockyBottomYesterday 21:46Yesterday at 21:46:55
- Re: EFL Trophy by ChudsYesterday 21:48Yesterday at 21:48:35
- Re: FAO Whammers by RockyBottomYesterday 20:39Yesterday at 20:39:54
- Re: FAO Whammers by SFCfoxYesterday 21:32Yesterday at 21:32:18
- Re: FAO Whammers by SevYesterday 20:53Yesterday at 20:53:29
- Re: FAO Whammers by NorfolkIANYesterday 20:58Yesterday at 20:58:35
- Re: FAO Whammers by SevYesterday 21:12Yesterday at 21:12:47
- Re: FAO Whammers by RockyBottomYesterday 21:35Yesterday at 21:35:35
- Re: FAO Whammers by ChudsYesterday 21:02Yesterday at 21:02:43
- Re: FAO Whammers by jayessYesterday 21:05Yesterday at 21:05:45
- Re: FAO Whammers by ChudsYesterday 21:15Yesterday at 21:15:12
- Re: FAO Whammers by RockyBottomYesterday 21:38Yesterday at 21:38:08
- Re: FAO Whammers by jayessYesterday 21:20Yesterday at 21:20:49
- Re: FAO Whammers by NorfolkIANYesterday 21:19Yesterday at 21:19:33
- Re: FAO Whammers by jayessYesterday 21:21Yesterday at 21:21:58 1 person
- Re: FAO Whammers by BaldersYesterday 20:55Yesterday at 20:55:26
- Re: FAO Whammers by RockyBottomYesterday 21:38Yesterday at 21:38:54
- Re: FAO Whammers by ChudsYesterday 21:23Yesterday at 21:23:12
- Re: FAO Whammers by SevYesterday 21:30Yesterday at 21:30:11
- Re: FAO Whammers by ChudsYesterday 19:18Yesterday at 19:18:47
- Re: FAO Whammers by ChudsYesterday 19:33Yesterday at 19:33:03
- Re: FAO Whammers by SevYesterday 19:13Yesterday at 19:13:39
- Re: FAO Whammers by MerseyBoroYesterday 19:01Yesterday at 19:01:31
- Re: FAO Whammers by ChudsYesterday 19:19Yesterday at 19:19:44 1 person
- Re: FAO Whammers by NorfolkIANYesterday 19:36Yesterday at 19:36:30
- Re: FAO Whammers by SFC-ChrisYesterday 19:45Yesterday at 19:45:25
- Re: FAO Whammers by RockyBottomYesterday 19:39Yesterday at 19:39:42 1 person